Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895484›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. HIV2022

Costs and impact on HIV transmission of a switch from a criminalisation to a public health approach to injecting drug use in eastern Europe and central Asia: a modelling analysis.

Zoe Ward, Jack Stone, Chrissy Bishop, Viktor Ivakin, Ksenia Eritsyan, Anna Deryabina, Andrea Low, Javier Cepeda, Sherrie L Kelly, Robert Heimer and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. HIV, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Zoe WardPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jack StonePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chrissy BishopEconomist Intelligence Unit, London, UK.
Viktor IvakinICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Ksenia EritsyanSociology Department, HSE University, St Petersburg, Russia.
Anna DeryabinaICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Andrea LowICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Javier CepedaDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sherrie L KellyBurnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Robert HeimerDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Robert CookEconomist Intelligence Unit, London, UK.
Frederick L AlticeSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Taylor LitzSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Assel TerlikbayevaColumbia University Global Health Research Center of Central Asia, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Nabila El-BasselDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Denis HavarkovRepublican Scientific and Practical Center of Medical Technologies, Informatization, Management and Economics of Public Health, Minsk, Belarus.
Alena FisenkaRepublican Scientific and Practical Center of Medical Technologies, Informatization, Management and Economics of Public Health, Minsk, Belarus.
Anelia BoshnakovaEconomist Intelligence Unit, London, UK.
Andrey KlepikovAlliance for Public Health, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana SaliukAlliance for Public Health, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana DeshkoAlliance for Public Health, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Peter VickermanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: peter.vickerman@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Increasing Access to Hepatitis C Treatment in Opioid Endemic Rural Areas: the Kentucky Viral Hepatitis Treatment (KeY Treat) StudyR01DA047952 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HAVENS, JENNIFER R · 2018 to 2023
$8.7M
Prison Interventions and HIV Prevention CollaborationR01DA029910 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FREDERICK LEWIS ALTICE · 2010 to 2026
$7.9M
Expanding Medication Assisted Therapy in Ukraine (ExMAT)R01DA033679 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2012 to 2021
$6.4M
Naltrexone for Opioid Dependent Released HIV+ Criminal Justice PopulationsR01DA030762 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPRINGER, SANDRA ANN · 2010 to 2015
$4.1M
HIV, Buprenorphine, and the Criminal Justice SystemR01DA030768 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2010 to 2015
$4.0M
Intervention of HIV, Drug Use and the Criminal Justice System in MalaysiaR01DA025943 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2008 to 2012
$2.7M
Optimizing HIV prevention portfolios targeting people who inject drugs using dynamic economic modelingR01AI147490 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MARTIN, NATASHA · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
Enhancing Health Outcomes Among HIV+ Substance AbusersK24DA017072 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2003 to 2012
$1.5M
Modeling Structural HIV Determinants in Substance Users and related populationsR01DA037773 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MARTIN, NATASHA, STRATHDEE, STEFFANIE A. · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
MODELING THE IMPACT OF A POLICE EDUCATION PROGRAM ON HIV INCIDENCE AMONG PEOPLE WHO INJECT DRUGSK01DA043421 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CEPEDA, JAVIER · 2017 to 2021
$941k
Modeling HCV/HIV transmission and Treatment as Prevention in U.S. Networks of People Who Inject DrugsR21DA041953 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2016 to 2017
$480k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147490NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA043421NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA017072NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025943NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029910NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030762NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030768NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033679NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037773NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047952NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA041953NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA046809NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA047902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV incidence is increasing in eastern Europe and central Asia, primarily driven by injecting drug use. Coverage of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and opioid agonist therapy are suboptimal, with many people who inject drugs (PWID) being incarcerated. We aimed to assess whether use of monies saved as a result of decriminalisation of drug use or possession to scale up ART and opioid agonist therapy could control HIV transmission among PWID in eastern Europe and central Asia.

methodsA dynamic HIV transmission model among PWID incorporating incarceration, ART, and opioid agonist therapy was calibrated to Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and St Petersburg (Russia). Country-specific costs for opioid agonist therapy, ART, and incarceration were collated or estimated. Compared with baseline, the model prospectively projected the life-years gained, incremental costs (2018 euros), and infections prevented over 2020-40 for three scenarios. The decriminalisation scenario removed incarceration resulting from drug use or possession for personal use, reducing incarceration among PWID by 24·8% in Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan and 46·4% in St Petersburg; the public health approach scenario used savings from decriminalisation to scale up ART and opioid agonist therapy; and the full scale-up scenario included the decriminalisation scenario plus investment of additional resources to scale up ART to the UNAIDS 90-90-90 target of 81% coverage and opioid agonist therapy to the WHO target of 40% coverage. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year gained for each scenario were calculated and compared with country-specific gross domestic product per-capita willingness-to-pay thresholds. Costs and life-years gained were discounted 3% annually.

findingsCurrent levels of incarceration, opioid agonist therapy, and ART were estimated to cost from €198 million (95% credibility interval 173-224) in Kyrgyzstan to €4129 million (3897-4358) in Kazakhstan over 2020-40; 74·8-95·8% of these total costs were incarceration costs. Decriminalisation resulted in cost savings (€38-773 million due to reduced prison costs; 16·9-26·1% reduction in overall costs) but modest life-years gained (745-1694). The public health approach was cost saving, allowing each setting to reach 81% ART coverage and 29·7-41·8% coverage of opioid agonist therapy, resulting in 17 768-148 464 life-years gained and 58·9-83·7% of infections prevented. Results were similar for the full scale-up scenario.

interpretationCost savings from decriminalisation of drug use could greatly reduce HIV transmission through increased coverage of opioid agonist therapy and ART among PWID in eastern Europe and central Asia.

fundingAlliance for Public Health, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Institute for Drug Abuse, and Economist Intelligence Unit.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSubstance-Related DisordersAsiaCost-Benefit AnalysisEurope, EasternHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID34895484
PMCPMC8762142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.