ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2022
HLA-A*03 and response to immune checkpoint blockade in cancer: an epidemiological biomarker study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic relevance of prognostic nutritional indices in gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Introduction to Pharmacogenomics: Role of the Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory in Personalised Medicine-Current Status and Future Prospects.International journal of immunogenetics · 2026Review
- Combination Immunotherapy as a Promising Strategy to Overcome Immunotherapy Resistance: From Emergence to Next-Generation Approaches.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Analysis of microsatellite instability intensity in single-cell resolution with scMnT reveals tumor heterogeneity in colorectal cancer.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on the detection and clinical application of tumor mutational burden.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Lung cancer vaccines to enhance immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: evidence and future perspectives.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Genetically Validated Immune Susceptibility Markers for Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Omics Mendelian Randomization Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Inhibitory receptor states, immune homeostasis and the benefit-risk boundary of cancer checkpoint blockade.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Characterization of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Proteins with Integrated Immunopeptidomics and Proteomics Approach.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Patient-specific HLA-I subtypes predict response to immune checkpoint blockade.Oncoimmunology · 2025Article
- Risk factors and mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Advancing human leukocyte antigen-based cancer immunotherapy: from personalized to broad-spectrum strategies for genetically heterogeneous populations.Trends in cancer · 2025Review
- Immunological features of clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Upfront whole blood transcriptional patterns in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors associate with clinical outcome.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- Allele-specific HLA LOH in solid tumors: distinct patterns by tumor type and potential prognostic relevance.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Regulatory polymorphisms ofJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- The correlation of HLA-A in Thai EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer, outcome, and tumor microenvironment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Oncologist, 2025, Vol, XX, Issue XX Predictive role of ARID1A and B2M mutations and the antigen presentation pathway in the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Mapping the genetic landscape establishing a tumor immune microenvironment favorable for anti-PD-1 response.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Differential gene expression analysis in French bulldog high grade oligodendroglioma: breed-associated differences in tumor and tumor microenvironment gene expression.Companion animal health and genetics · 2025Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredictive biomarkers could allow more precise use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating advanced cancers. Given the central role of HLA molecules in immunity, variation at the HLA loci could differentially affect the response to ICIs. The aim of this epidemiological study was to determine the effect of HLA-A*03 as a biomarker for predicting response to immunotherapy.
methodsIn this epidemiological study, we investigated the clinical outcomes (overall survival, progression free survival, and objective response rate) after treatment for advanced cancer in eight cohorts of patients: three observational cohorts of patients with various types of advanced tumours (the Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets [MSK-IMPACT] cohort, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute [DFCI] Profile cohort, and The Cancer Genome Atlas) and five clinical trials of patients with advanced bladder cancer (JAVELIN Solid Tumour) or renal cell carcinoma (CheckMate-009, CheckMate-010, CheckMate-025, and JAVELIN Renal 101). In total, these cohorts included 3335 patients treated with various ICI agents (anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors) and 10 917 patients treated with non-ICI cancer-directed therapeutic approaches. We initially modelled the association of HLA amino-acid variation with overall survival in the MSK-IMPACT discovery cohort, followed by a detailed analysis of the association between HLA-A*03 and clinical outcomes in MSK-IMPACT, with replication in the additional cohorts (two further observational cohorts and five clinical trials).
findingsHLA-A*03 was associated in an additive manner with reduced overall survival after ICI treatment in the MSK-IMPACT cohort (HR 1·48 per HLA-A*03 allele [95% CI 1·20-1·82], p=0·00022), the validation DFCI Profile cohort (HR 1·22 per HLA-A*03 allele, 1·05-1·42; p=0·0097), and in the JAVELIN Solid Tumour clinical trial for bladder cancer (HR 1·36 per HLA-A*03 allele, 1·01-1·85; p=0·047). The HLA-A*03 effect was observed across ICI agents and tumour types, but not in patients treated with alternative therapies. Patients with HLA-A*03 had shorter progression-free survival in the pooled patient population from the three CheckMate clinical trials of nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma (HR 1·31, 1·01-1·71; p=0·044), but not in those receiving control (everolimus) therapies. Objective responses were observed in none of eight HLA-A*03 homozygotes in the ICI group (compared with 59 [26·6%] of 222 HLA-A*03 non-carriers and 13 (17·1%) of 76 HLA-A*03 heterozygotes). HLA-A*03 was associated with shorter progression-free survival in patients receiving ICI in the JAVELIN Renal 101 randomised clinical trial for renal cell carcinoma (avelumab plus axitinib; HR 1·59 per HLA-A*03 allele, 1·16-2·16; p=0·0036), but not in those receiving control (sunitinib) therapy. Objective responses were recorded in one (12·5%) of eight HLA-A*03 homozygotes in the ICI group (compared with 162 [63·8%] of 254 HLA-A*03 non-carriers and 40 [55·6%] of 72 HLA-A*03 heterozygotes). HLA-A*03 was associated with impaired outcome in meta-analysis of all 3335 patients treated with ICI at genome-wide significance (p=2·01 × 10
fundingNational Institutes of Health, Merck KGaA, and Pfizer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.