Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895413›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2021

A Scoping Review of the Implementation of Local Health and Social Services for Older Adults.

Alexandra Ethier, Annie Carrier

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Confronting Barriers to Improving Healthcare Performance in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra EthierPhD Student, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke; Student, Research Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC.
Annie CarrierProfessor, École de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke; Researcher, Research Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing elder-dedicated local health and social services (LHSS) is primary for older Canadian adults to age in place. However, there is currently no synthesis of the factors (barriers and facilitators) involved in LHSS implementation.

objectiveThis study aimed to synthesize current knowledge about the institutional factors involved in elder-dedicated LHSS implementation by describing them and their influence.

methodsA scoping review was conducted using eight databases and the grey literature. Data were analyzed thematically.

resultsA total of 23 documents led to the identification of 15 inter-influencing factors (12 barriers and 11 facilitators). Indeed, 20 connections were noted among factors, mostly among barriers. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATION: Although some barriers and facilitators also affect the implementation of services dedicated to the general population in Canada, the interplay between agism and power issues needs to be taken into consideration for a successful elder-dedicated LHSS implementation.

Indexed as

Social WorkAgedCanadaHumans

Identifiers

PMID34895413
PMCPMC8665730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.