Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895374›Full record

ArticleDevelopment and psychopathology2023

Interrogating the validity of cumulative indices of environmental and genetic risk for negative developmental outcomes.

Keith F Widaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development and psychopathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keith F WidamanUniversity of California, Riverside, CA92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6424-3998

Funding

A Cognitive Test Battery for Intellectual DisabilitiesR01HD076189 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DAVID R HESSL · 2014 to 2026
$8.6M
Brain pathologies, reserve and cognition in aging and dementiaRF1AG031563 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MUNGAS, DAN M. · 2015 to 2015
$3.8M
Effects of Antioxidants and Inflammation in Older PeopleK23AG021029 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HU, PEIFENG · 2004 to 2007
$517k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG021029NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG031563NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indices of cumulative risk (CR) have long been used in developmental research to encode the number of risk factors a child or adolescent experiences that may impede optimal developmental outcomes. Initial contributions concentrated on indices of cumulative environmental risk; more recently, indices of cumulative genetic risk have been employed. In this article, regression analytic methods are proposed for interrogating strongly the validity of risk indices by testing optimality of compositing weights, enabling more informative modeling of effects of CR indices. Reanalyses of data from two studies are reported. One study involved 10 environmental risk factors predicting Verbal IQ in 215 four-year-old children. The second study included an index of genetic CR in a G×E interaction investigation of 281 target participants assessed at age 15 years and then again at age 31 years for observed hostility during videotaped interactions with close family relations. Principles to guide evaluation of results of statistical modeling are presented, and implications of results for research and theory are discussed. The ultimate goals of this paper are to develop stronger tests of conjectures involving CR indices and to promote methods for improving replicability of results across studies.

Indexed as

HostilityAdolescentAdultChildHumansRisk Factorsenvironmental riskG×E interactiongenetic riskregression analysisrisk indices

Identifiers

PMID34895374
PMCPMC9189257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.