Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895321›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2021

Tiotropium bromide as adjunct therapy in children with asthma: a clinical experience.

Zainab Ridha, Marc-Antoine Bédard, Anna Smyrnova, Olivier Drouin, Aniela Pruteanu, Sandrine Essouri, Francine M Ducharme

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zainab RidhaFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050, Avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. zainab.ridha.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1325-1146
Marc-Antoine BédardDepartment of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anna SmyrnovaClinical Research and Knowledge Transfer Unit On Childhood Asthma, Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Olivier DrouinClinical Research and Knowledge Transfer Unit On Childhood Asthma, Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Aniela PruteanuDepartment of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sandrine EssouriDepartment of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Francine M DucharmeClinical Research and Knowledge Transfer Unit On Childhood Asthma, Research Centre, Sainte-Justine University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Initiative for Asthma has only recently added tiotropium bromide as adjunct controller therapy in severe asthma (Step 4 or 5) in adults (2015) and children (2019). Although not yet approved for pediatric use by Health Canada, it has been occasionally offered by asthma specialists as a therapeutic trial in children with troublesome asthma or treatment for adverse effects. The objective of this study was to describe the indications and real-life clinical experience in initiating tiotropium in children with asthma.

methodsWe designed a retrospective mixed-method case series study of children aged 1-17 years who initiated tiotropium in our tertiary-care centre between 2013 and 2020. Clinical information was extracted from electronic medical records and tiotropium dispensing, from drug claims. Parents/children and physicians independently completed a questionnaire about treatment goals, perceived efficacy, safety, satisfaction, and lessons learned.

resultsThe 34 (11 females; 23 males) children had a median (range) age of 9.1 (1.4-17.8) years. Children were primarily on Step 4 (85%) or 5 (6%) prior to tiotropium initiation, yet most (84%) did not increase their treatment step after tiotropium initiation. The physicians' treatment goals were to improve asthma control, alleviate adverse effects of current therapy, and/or improve lung function. The most improved symptoms were coughing/moist cough, difficulty breathing, whistling breath, and bronchial secretions/mucus. Although most parents and physicians reported a significant benefit with tiotropium bromide, physicians particularly remarked, as their "lesson learned', on the improvement in chronic symptoms in asthmatic children, particularly those with prominent moist cough and in lung function, in those with seemingly none (or incompletely) reversible obstruction as well as the ability to decrease the ICS and/or LABA dose to lessen adverse effects. A few physicians raised caution on the risk of lower adherence with an additional inhaler.

conclusionIn children with severe asthma on Step 4 or 5, tiotropium bromide was primarily used as substitute, rather than additional, adjunct therapy to improve asthma control, alleviate adverse effects, and/or to improve lung function. The latter two indications, combined with its perceived effectiveness in children with prominent moist cough, also suggest additional indications of tiotropium to be formally explored.

Indexed as

AsthmaCase seriesChildrenPediatric careTherapeutic trialTiotropium bromide

Identifiers

PMID34895321
PMCPMC8666101
OpenAlexW4225751965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.