Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895311›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.

Yonas Abebe, Fredrik Hetmann, Kacper Sumera, Matt Holland, Trine Staff

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Acute Traumatic Pain in the Emergency Department.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yonas AbebeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. yonbbb@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8814-5129
Fredrik HetmannBachelor Programme in Paramedics, Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Kacper SumeraEdge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Matt HollandLibrary and Knowledge Services for NHS Ambulance Services in England, Bolton, UK.
Trine StaffBachelor Programme in Paramedics, Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOEdge Hill University · GBNorth West Ambulance Service NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically meaningful pain reduction with respect to severity and the adverse events of drugs used in prehospital pain management for children are areas that have not received sufficient attention. The present systematic review therefore aims to perform a comprehensive search of databases to examine the preferable drugs for prehospital pain relief in paediatric patients with acute pain, irrespective of aetiology.

methodsThe systematic review includes studies from 2000 and up to 2020 that focus on children's prehospital pain management. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO with registration no. CRD42019126699. Pharmacological pain management using any type of analgesic drug and in all routes of administration was included. The main outcomes were (1) measurable pain reduction (effectiveness) and (2) no occurrence of any serious adverse events. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Epistemonikos and Cochrane library. Finally, the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist and a textual narrative analysis was performed due to the heterogeneity of the results.

resultsThe present systematic review on the effectiveness and safety of analgesic drugs in prehospital pain relief in children identified a total of eight articles. Most of the articles reviewed identified analgesic drugs such as fentanyl (intranasal/IV), morphine (IV), methoxyflurane (inhalational) and ketamine (IV/IM). The effects of fentanyl, morphine and methoxyflurane were examined and all of the included analgesic drugs were evaluated as effective. Adverse events of fentanyl, methoxyflurane and ketamine were also reported, although none of these were considered serious.

conclusionThe systematic review revealed that fentanyl, morphine, methoxyflurane and combination drugs are effective analgesic drugs for children in prehospital settings. No serious adverse events were reported following the administration of fentanyl, methoxyflurane and ketamine. Intranasal fentanyl and inhalational methoxyflurane seem to be the preferred drugs for children in pre-hospital settings due to their ease of administration, similar effect and safety profile when compared to other analgesic drugs. However, the level of evidence (LOE) in the included studies was only three or four, and further studies are therefore necessary.

Indexed as

Acute PainEmergency Medical ServicesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidChildFentanylHumansAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylAmbulanceAnalgesiaChildrenFentanylKetamineMethoxyfluraneMorphinePaediatricsPain managementPrehospital

Identifiers

PMID34895311
PMCPMC8665507
OpenAlexW4200386413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.