ArticleHead & face medicine2021
Success and complication rate of miniscrew assisted non-surgical palatal expansion in adults - a consecutive study using a novel force-controlled polycyclic activation protocol.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is efficacy of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in mid to late adolescents and young adults related to craniofacial sutures opening? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term efficacy and stability of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in mid to late adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2023Pooled it
- The sutural and dentoskeletal effects of alternate expansion and constriction of deficient maxilla in young adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Bone-Screw-Force Interactions in Palatal Orthodontic Mini-Implants: A Scoping Review and Decision Framework for Primary Stability and Biomechanically Driven Site Selection.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Cephalometric Sagittal Changes Suggestive of Maxillary Anterior Displacement and Mandibular Immediate Shift Following 3D-Guided Midpalatal Piezocorticotomy-Assisted MARPE in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Nasal Fracture During Maxillary Expansion-A Rare Complication?Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Unwanted creaniofacial fractures in MARPE/MASPE patients: a hidden risk?Progress in orthodontics · 2025Article
- Miniscrew-assisted slow palatal expansion with bone borne expander in adult patients: a case control study on consecutively treated patients.The Angle orthodontist · 2025Article
- Treatment outcomes of 3D-printed custom and conventional mini-implant assisted rapid palatal expanders (MARPE).Progress in orthodontics · 2025Article
- Maxillary Bone Fracture Due to a Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Skeletal versus conventional anchorage in dentofacial orthopedics: an international modified Delphi consensus study.Progress in orthodontics · 2025Review
- Comparison of Side Effects Between Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) and Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) in Adult Patients: A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion: A Scoping Review of Influencing Factors, Side Effects, and Soft Tissue Alterations.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Why does maxillary skeletal expansion work with some adults and fail with Others?: A narrative review.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- Dentoskeletal effects of mini-screw assisted, non-surgical palatal expansion in adults using a modified force-controlled polycyclic protocol: a single-centre retrospective study.European journal of orthodontics · 2024Article
- Effect of different palatal expanders with miniscrews in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A non-linear finite element analysis.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional analysis of miniscrew position changes during bone-borne expansion in young and late adolescent patients.Progress in orthodontics · 2023Article
- The comparison of biomechanical effects of the conventional and bone-borne palatal expanders on late adolescence with unilateral cleft palate: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBone-borne miniscrew assisted palatal expansion (MAPE) is a common technique to improve maxillary transverse deficiency in young adolescents. Adult patients usually present a challenge, as they often require additional surgical assisted maxillary expansion (SARPE). There is still no clear statement about non-surgical expansion in adult patients using this technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rate of non-surgical palatal expansion in adults utilizing MAPE with a novel force-controlled polycyclic expansion protocol (FCPC).
methodsThis consecutive study consisted of 33 adult patients with an average age of 29.1 ± 10.2 years (min. 18 years, max. 58 years), including one dropout patient. First, four miniscrews were inserted and after 12-weeks latency, the expander was placed and the FCPC protocol was applied (MAPE group). In case of missing expansion, a SARPE was performed (SARPE group). After maximum expansion, a cone beam CT was made and widening of the midpalatal suture was measured. The outcome variables were successful non-surgical expansion and, with sample size power above 80%, the odds of failed non-surgical expansion and associated complications were evaluated. The primary predictor variable was age. Statistical analysis was performed using R (Version 3.1) to calculate power, to construct various models for measuring the odds of requiring surgical intervention/complications, and others.
resultsSuccessful non-surgical expansion was achieved in 27 patients (84.4%), ranging from 18 to 49 years. Mean age differed significantly between both groups (26.8 ± 8.2 years vs. 41.3 ± 9.9 years; p < 0.001). Mean expansion at the anterior and posterior palate for the MAPE group was 5.4 ± 1.5 mm and 2.5 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. Among these subjects' complications were observed in 18.5%. Age significantly increased the odds of complications (p = 0.019).
conclusions1. The success rate of MAPE among individuals aged 18 to 49 years was 84.4%. 2. A V-shaped expansion pattern in the antero-posterior dimension was mostly observed. 3. Complications were significantly associated with age. 4. A careful expansion protocol seems to be beneficial to prevent unfavorable results in adult patients.
trial registrationConsecutive cohort study, Review Board No. EK-2-2014/0016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.