Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895277›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Measuring health science research and development in Africa: mapping the available data.

Clare Wenham, Olivier Wouters, Catherine Jones, Pamela A Juma, Rhona M Mijumbi-Deve, Joëlle L Sobngwi-Tambekou, Justin Parkhurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Characteristics of longitudinal maternal health studies in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic mapping of literature between 2012 and 2022.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Overcoming Vaccine Inequities and Research Gaps in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities Identified During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fixing Data Gaps for Population Health in Africa: An Urgent Need.International journal of public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clare WenhamDepartment of Health Policy, LSE, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom. c.wenham@lse.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5378-3203
Olivier WoutersDepartment of Health Policy, LSE, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Catherine JonesLSE Health, LSE, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Pamela A JumaLSE Health, LSE, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Rhona M Mijumbi-DeveLSE Health, LSE, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Joëlle L Sobngwi-TambekouLSE Health, LSE, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Justin ParkhurstDepartment of Health Policy, LSE, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years there have been calls to strengthen health sciences research capacity in African countries. This capacity can contribute to improvements in health, social welfare and poverty reduction through domestic application of research findings; it is increasingly seen as critical to pandemic preparedness and response. Developing research infrastructure and performance may reduce national economies' reliance on primary commodity and agricultural production, as countries strive to develop knowledge-based economies to help drive macroeconomic growth. Yet efforts to date to understand health sciences research capacity are limited to output metrics of journal citations and publications, failing to reflect the complexity of the health sciences research landscape in many settings.

methodsWe map and assess current capacity for health sciences research across all 54 countries of Africa by collecting a range of available data. This included structural indicators (research institutions and research funding), process indicators (clinical trial infrastructures, intellectual property rights and regulatory capacities) and output indicators (publications and citations).

resultsWhile there are some countries which perform well across the range of indicators used, for most countries the results are varied-suggesting high relative performance in some indicators, but lower in others. Missing data for key measures of capacity or performance is also a key concern. Taken as a whole, existing data suggest a nuanced view of the current health sciences research landscape on the African continent.

conclusionMapping existing data may enable governments and international organizations to identify where gaps in health sciences research capacity lie, particularly in comparison to other countries in the region. It also highlights gaps where more data are needed. These data can help to inform investment priorities and future system needs.

Indexed as

PandemicsResearchAfricaHumansAfricaCapacityHealth sciences researchIndicators

Identifiers

PMID34895277
PMCPMC8665309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.