Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895127›Full record

ArticleCurrent stem cell research & therapy2023

Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells: What They Are and What They Can Become.

Margit Rosner, Markus Hengstschläger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margit RosnerInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus HengstschlägerInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last two decades, fetal amniotic fluid stem cells progressively attracted attention in the context of both basic research and the development of innovative therapeutic concepts. They exhibit broadly multipotent plasticity with the ability to differentiate into cells of all three embryonic germ layers and low immunogenicity. They are convenient to maintain, highly proliferative, genomically stable, non-tumorigenic, perfectly amenable to genetic modifications, and do not raise ethical concerns. However, it is important to note that among the various fetal amniotic fluid cells, only c-Kit+ amniotic fluid stem cells represent a distinct entity showing the full spectrum of these features. Since amniotic fluid additionally contains numerous terminally differentiated cells and progenitor cells with more limited differentiation potentials, it is of highest relevance to always precisely describe the isolation procedure and characteristics of the used amniotic fluid-derived cell type. It is of obvious interest for scientists, clinicians, and patients alike to be able to rely on up-todate and concisely separated pictures of the utilities as well as the limitations of terminally differentiated amniotic fluid cells, amniotic fluid-derived progenitor cells, and c-Kit+ amniotic fluid stem cells, to drive these distinct cellular models towards as many individual clinical applications as possible.

Indexed as

Amniotic FluidFetal Stem CellsCell DifferentiationGene EditingHumansStem Cellsamniotic fluidAmniotic fluid stem cellsbasic researchcell therapyc-Kitfetal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID34895127
OpenAlexW4200109257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.