Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894914›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2021

Clinicians and individuals with acquired brain injury perspectives about factors that influence mobility: creating a core set of mobility domains among individuals with acquired brain injury.

Rehab Alhasani, Dennis Radman, Claudine Auger, Anouk Lamontagne, Sara Ahmed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06867081 (Effectiveness of a Customized Digital Platform to Increase Coordination of Care and Uptake of Evidence-based Practices), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06867081 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Customized Digital Platform to Increase Coordination of Care and Uptake of Evidence-based Practices: a Protocol for a Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Trial in Quebec

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater MontrealRan2025 to 2029Enrolled962ConditionsAquired Brain Injury, Traumatic Brain Injuries, Stroke, Cardiovascular DiseasesArmsThe intervention will be the BRILLIANT Platform, an online platform which provides five Modules aimed at increasing coordination of care and direct rehabilitation time
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rehab AlhasaniFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Dennis RadmanFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Claudine AugerCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0159-2004
Anouk LamontagneFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sara AhmedFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-6790
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAJewish Rehabilitation Hospital · CAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify factors which may influence mobility and could be considered during the evaluation of mobility in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) following qualitative focus groups with both clinicians and individuals with ABI, to assess their needs and preferences in order to individualize their care management plans.

methodsFive focus groups were held, three with clinicians from 3 rehabilitation sites of CRIR (CRDM:

resultsFour themes were identified: considering mobility holistically and individual needs, preferences, and unique experiences; assessment and intervention guidelines; support network; and uncertainty about symptoms and recovery. Using the ten-rule International Classification, Functioning, Disability, and Health framework linking process, codes were categorized into Body Functions Activity and Participation, and Environmental Factors exploring the prominent domains that mostly identify factors influencing mobility.

conclusionsComprehensive measurement of mobility remains an ongoing challenge owing to multiple contributing factors, ranging from personal and psychosocial factors to the influence of a myriad of environmental and community considerations. Preparing individuals with ABI for community mobility can be substantially improved if healthcare professionals employ communicative tools to facilitate shared decision making with patients and to deliver patient-centred rehabilitation care.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesLocomotionFocus GroupsHumansStrokeStroke Rehabilitationacquired brain injuryassessmentfocus grouphealth and disability frameworkinternational classification of functioningMobility

Identifiers

PMID34894914
PMCPMC8676689
OpenAlexW4200311858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.