Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894842›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2022

Debunking the myth of 'Blue Mondays': No evidence of affect drop after taking clinical MDMA.

Ben Sessa, Jacob S Aday, Steve O'Brien, H Valerie Curran, Fiona Measham, Laurie Higbed, David J Nutt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of MDMA-Assisted Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Not too quick on "Debunking the myth of 'Blue Mondays'".Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ben SessaCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-6060
Jacob S AdayDepartment of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0578-8530
Steve O'BrienCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
H Valerie CurranResearch Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Fiona MeashamDepartment of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Laurie HigbedCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David J NuttCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBCentral Michigan University · USNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncorporating 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) as an adjunct to psychotherapy has shown promise in recent years for treating various mental health conditions, particularly those involving trauma. However, concerns about declines in mood and cognition during the days following dosing, also known as 'Blue Mondays', have been raised as limitations to its clinical use. Although these changes have been well-documented among recreational users, there are critical confounds to these reports that limit generalizability to clinically administered MDMA.

aimsHere, we aimed to evaluate the evidence basis for the negative side effects associated with MDMA as well as inform our understanding of the drug's post-acute effects in a clinical context with an open-label study.

methodsThe current open-label study examined MDMA therapy for alcohol use disorder (AUD;

resultsParticipants maintained a positive mood during the week following drug administration in a clinical context. Relative to baseline, self-reported sleep quality improved at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Finally, no participants reported using or desiring to use illicit MDMA, and the anecdotal reports indicated that they perceived the treatment favourably.

conclusionThe results support the overall safety and tolerability of clinically administered MDMA and, importantly, suggest that the 'come downs' previously associated with the substance may be explained by confounds in research relating to the illicit sourcing of the drug and specific environmental setting for recreational consumption.

Indexed as

AlcoholismHallucinogensN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineAffectAlcohol DrinkingCognitionHumansHallucinogensN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminealcohol use disorderBlue Mondayscome downsecstasyMDMApsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34894842
OpenAlexW4200451173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.