ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022
Factors associated with in-stent stenosis after cerebral aneurysm embolization using a Pipeline embolization device.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nomogram for predicting in-stent stenosis after pipeline embolization device treatment in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a multicenter model development and validation study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors for in-stent stenosis after flow-diverter implantation for intracranial aneurysm: a single center analysis of 161 consecutive patients.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Stent match of pipeline embolization device: prediction of incomplete occlusion and in-stent stenosis by actual stent size after implantation.Neurosurgical review · 2025Observational
- Comprehensive Analysis of Post-Pipeline Endothelialization and Remodeling.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- An increase in flow-diverter oversizing values as an independent risk factor for developing more severe in-stent stenosis. A retrospective single-center study based on flow diversion of supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes and dynamic changes of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2023Article
- And don't forget your anti in-stent stenosis pill! Commentary on 'Factors associated with in-stent stenosis after cerebral aneurysm embolization using a Pipeline embolization device' by Flores-Milan et al.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Article
- Could statin improve outcomes after pipeline embolization for intracranial aneurysms in a real-world setting?Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2023Article
- Machine learning to predict in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device placement.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFlow-diverting (FD) stents, with or without coiling, are a mainstay in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). One observed complication from flow diverter stent (FDS) insertion has been in-stent stenosis. Though previously studied in the short-term period, the long-term history of this complication has yet to be described.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive IAs treated with Pipeline Embolization Device (PED), with or without coiling, at our centre between September 2014 and December 2018 that had at least one digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) during follow-up. In-stent stenosis was measured from DSA images, and associated patient and procedural characteristics were analysed.
results94 patients treated with PED for IA were identified. On initial DSA during follow-up, 52 patients (55.3%) had in-stent stenosis within the PED. Of these 52 patients, 17 had a second DSA during follow-up. In this 2
conclusionsIn-stent stenosis after FDS placement was seen in 53.2% of cases, which had between 1-50% of stenosis. 82.4% had resolution/improvement of their stenosis. Statin use was protective of in-stent stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.