Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894754›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2021

The effect of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation under various load cases : results from a combined experimental, micro-CT, and micro-finite element analysis.

Yan Chevalier, Maiko Matsuura, Sven Krüger, Hannes Traxler, Christoph Fleege, Michael Rauschmann, Christoph Schilling

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yan ChevalierDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1207-5467
Maiko MatsuuraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sven KrügerAesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Hannes TraxlerCenter of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph Fleege
Michael RauschmannDepartment of Spine and Reconstructive Surgery, Sana Klinik Offenbach, Academic University Hospital, Offenbach, Germany.
Christoph SchillingAesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATSana Klinikum Offenbach · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAnchorage of pedicle screw rod instrumentation in the elderly spine with poor bone quality remains challenging. Our study aims to evaluate how the screw bone anchorage is affected by screw design, bone quality, loading conditions, and cementing techniques.

methodsMicro-finite element (µFE) models were created from micro-CT (μCT) scans of vertebrae implanted with two types of pedicle screws (L: Ennovate and R: S

resultsExperimental pull-out strengths were excellently correlated to the µFE pull-out stiffness of the ROI (R

conclusionThis combined experimental, µCT and µFE study showed that regional analyses may be sufficient to predict fixation strength in pull-out and that full analyses could show that cement augmentation around pedicle screws increased fixation stiffness in both pull-out and bending, especially for low-density bone. Cite this article:

Indexed as

bone densitybone qualityCement augmentationMicro-CTMicro-finite element analysisPedicle screwPedicle screw fixationpedicle screwsregion of interestStiffnessstrengthsVertebraevertebral bone

Identifiers

PMID34894754
PMCPMC8696523
OpenAlexW4200054902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.