Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894641›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

T

Jeff Snyder, Kelly C McPhee, Alan H Wilman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeff SnyderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-2202
Kelly C McPheeCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8239-4805
Alan H WilmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP 102582Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2017-04006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThree-dimensional fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences commonly use very long echo trains (>64 echoes) and severely reduced refocusing angles. They are increasingly used in brain exams due to high, isotropic resolution and reasonable scan time when using long trains and short interecho spacing. In this study, T

methodsThe FSE sequence design was explored to use long echo trains while minimizing T

resultsPhantom and healthy in vivo brain T

conclusionT

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, Imagingextended phase graphfast spin echoquantitative MRIrelaxationT 2

Identifiers

PMID34894641
PMCPMC9299830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.