Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894428›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2022

Direct and opportunity costs related to utilizing maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia.

HaEun Lee, Elisa M Maffioli, Philip T Veliz, Isaac Sakala, Nchimunya M Chiboola, Jody R Lori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

HaEun LeeSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N Ingalls St. Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States. Electronic address: haeunlee@umich.edu.
Elisa M MaffioliSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Philip T VelizSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N Ingalls St. Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States.
Isaac SakalaAfricare Zambia, Flat A, Plot 2407/10 MBX, Off Twin Palm Road, Ibex Hill, Box 33921 Lusaka, Zambia.
Nchimunya M ChiboolaAfricare Zambia, Flat A, Plot 2407/10 MBX, Off Twin Palm Road, Ibex Hill, Box 33921 Lusaka, Zambia.
Jody R LoriSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N Ingalls St. Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the direct and opportunity costs involved in utilising maternity waiting homes.

methodA cross-sectional admission survey administered to women who used ten maternity waiting homes across two rural districts in Zambia. A total of 3,796 women participated in the survey. Descriptive analysis was conducted on three domains of the data: demographic characteristics of women, direct costs, and opportunity costs.

findingsWaiting to deliver (86.3%), safe birth (70.8%), and distance (56.0%) were the most frequent reasons women reported for using a maternity waiting home. In terms of direct costs, roughly 65% of the women brought seven days or fewer days' worth of food to the maternity waiting homes, with salt, mealie meals, and vegetables being the most frequently brought items. Only 5.8% of the women spent money on transport. More than half of the women reported paying user fees that ranged from 1 to 5 or more kwacha (US$0.10- 0.52). In terms of opportunity costs, 52% of the women participated in some form of income generating activities (IGAs) when at home. Approximately 35% of the women reported they lost earned income (1 to 50 or more kwacha) by staying at a maternity waiting home.

conclusionA large proportion of women paid for food and user fees to access a maternity waiting home, while a low number of women paid for transport. Even though it is difficult to assign monetary value to women's household chores, being away from these responsibilities and the potential loss of earned income appear to remain a cost to accessing maternity waiting homes. More research is needed to understand how to overcome these financial constraints and assist women in utilising a maternity waiting home.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPregnancyRural PopulationZambiaDirect costFinancial barrierMaternity waiting homeMothers’ shelterOpportunity costZambia

Identifiers

PMID34894428
PMCPMC8811481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.