Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894340›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2022

Beyond the Mean: A Flexible Framework for Studying Causal Effects Using Linear Models.

Christian Gische, Manuel C Voelkle

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Causal inference on human behaviour.Nature human behaviour · 2024
    Review
  5. Forecasting Causal Effects of Interventions versus Predicting Future Outcomes.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian GischeDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18, 12489,  Berlin, Germany. christian.gische@hu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7372-2894
Manuel C VoelkleDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18, 12489,  Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph-based causal models are a flexible tool for causal inference from observational data. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive framework to define, identify, and estimate a broad class of causal quantities in linearly parametrized graph-based models. The proposed method extends the literature, which mainly focuses on causal effects on the mean level and the variance of an outcome variable. For example, we show how to compute the probability that an outcome variable realizes within a target range of values given an intervention, a causal quantity we refer to as the probability of treatment success. We link graph-based causal quantities defined via the do-operator to parameters of the model implied distribution of the observed variables using so-called causal effect functions. Based on these causal effect functions, we propose estimators for causal quantities and show that these estimators are consistent and converge at a rate of [Formula: see text] under standard assumptions. Thus, causal quantities can be estimated based on sample sizes that are typically available in the social and behavioral sciences. In case of maximum likelihood estimation, the estimators are asymptotically efficient. We illustrate the proposed method with an example based on empirical data, placing special emphasis on the difference between the interventional and conditional distribution.

Indexed as

Research DesignCausalityLinear ModelsProbabilityPsychometricsacyclic directed mixed graphscausal inferencegraph-based causal modelsstructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID34894340
PMCPMC9433367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.