Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894316›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022

Work Ability After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Followed by a Structured Postoperative Rehabilitation: Secondary Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Multi-Centre Trial with a 2-year Follow-up.

Anneli Peolsson, Johanna Wibault, Håkan Löfgren, Åsa Dedering, Birgitta Öberg, Peter Zsigmond, Charlotte Wåhlin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01547611 (Outcome of Physiotherapy After Surgery for Cervical Disc Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01547611 nacompletednot on this map

Outcome of Physiotherapy After Surgery for Cervical Disc Disease: a Prospective Randomised Multi-Centre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2009 to 2014Enrolled202ConditionsRadiculopathyArmsCustomary treatment, Structured behavioural medicine program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effectiveness of physiotherapy and rehabilitation after cervical spinal surgery: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with internal fixation vs conventional surgery in the treatment of cervical disc herniation.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anneli PeolssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Lasarettsgatan, House 511, 14th floor, 58183, Linköping, Sweden. Anneli.Peolsson@liu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-4432
Johanna WibaultDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Lasarettsgatan, House 511, 14th floor, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Håkan LöfgrenNeuro-Orthopedic Center, Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Åsa DederingDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Birgitta ÖbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Lasarettsgatan, House 511, 14th floor, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Peter ZsigmondDepartment of Neurosurgery, Linköping University Hospital, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Charlotte WåhlinDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Lasarettsgatan, House 511, 14th floor, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Information on work ability after ACDF and postoperative rehabilitation is lacking. The aim of the present study is therefore to investigate the work ability benefits of a structured postoperative treatment (SPT) over a standard care approach (SA) in patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy and factors important to the 2-year outcome. Methods Secondary outcome and prediction model of a prospective randomized controlled multi-centre study with a 2-year follow-up (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01547611). The Work Ability Index (WAI) and Work Ability Score (WAS) were measured at baseline and up to 2 years after ACDF in 154 patients of working age who underwent SPT or SA after surgery. Predictive factors for the WAI at 2 years were analysed. Results Both WAI and WAS significantly improved with SPT and SA (p < 0.001), without any between-group differences. Thoughts of being able to work within the next 6 months, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and work-related neck load explained 59% of the variance in WAI at the 2-year follow-up after ACDF. Conclusions Patients improved over time without group differences, suggesting the improvement to be surgery related. Expectation to work within the next 6 months, self-reported neck functioning and work-related neck load were important to work ability and are central factors to ask early after ACDF, to identifying further interventions promoting return to work.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeWork Capacity EvaluationDecompressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCervical radiculopathyRehabilitationSpineSurgeryWork ability

Identifiers

PMID34894316
PMCPMC9576644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.