Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894303›Full record

SynthesisCurrent pain and headache reports2021

Intrathecal Baclofen Monotherapy and Polyanalgesia for Treating Chronic Pain in Patients with Severe Spasticity.

Anuj Marathe, Sameer Allahabadi, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Michael Saulino, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Vwaire Orhurhu, Jay Karri

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current pain and headache reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anuj MaratheDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. anuj.marathe@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0387-821X
Sameer AllahabadiTCU & UNTHSC School of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesia, Division of Pain Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael SaulinoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Moss Rehab and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jonathan M HagedornDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Vwaire OrhurhuDepartment of Anesthesia, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Susquehanna, PA, USA.
Jay KarriDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of North Texas · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIntrathecal drug delivery is a well evidenced strategy for the treatment of many chronic pain syndromes. While opioids, anesthetics, and ziconotide are the most commonly used agents, intrathecal baclofen (ITB), which is indicated to treat spasticity, is also thought to have some analgesic properties that are poorly understood. These analgesic benefits have been reported with ITB use in treating patients with central neurological disorders who suffer from severe spasticity and chronic pain. Our review aims to characterize ITB's effects on pain, function, and quality of life in patients with severe spasticity. We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome parameters were analgesic relief and functional improvements. Secondarily, quality of life and adverse effects were also recorded. RECENT

findingsAfter an initial survey identified 393 studies, 20 studies met final inclusion criteria. Of these, 16 utilized ITB monotherapy and 4 utilized ITB polyanalgesia. Overall, there was a paucity of high-powered studies. Mean titrated ITB doses ranged from 140 to 627.9 μg daily. Nineteen studies reported improved pain and spasticity. Seven studies reported improved functional outcomes and quality of life. Our results show that ITB may be an effective agent in treatingfor the treatment of chronic pain in patients with severe spasticity independent of its spasmolytic effects. Although this evidence was largely derived from studies lacking clearly defined outcomes of pain relief, ITB is reasonable to consider for concurrent spasticity and pain management. Well-designed studies are still needed to characterize ITB's analgesic efficacy when used in patients with severe spasticity.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMuscle Relaxants, CentralBaclofenHumansMuscle SpasticityQuality of LifeBaclofenMuscle Relaxants, CentralBaclofenChronic painIntrathecalMorphinePolyanalgesiaSpasticity

Identifiers

PMID34894303
OpenAlexW4200278097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.