Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894294›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2021

Using amide proton transfer-weighted MRI to non-invasively differentiate mismatch repair deficient and proficient tumors in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Yuan Li, Xinyu Liu, Xiaoqi Wang, Chengyu Lin, Yafei Qi, Bo Chen, Hailong Zhou, Qiaoling Wu, Jing Ren, Jia Zhao and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan Li *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinyu Liu *Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqi Wang *Philips Healthcare China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chengyu LinDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Yafei QiDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Bo ChenDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hailong ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Qiaoling WuDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jing RenDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jia ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Junjun YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yang XiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yonglan HeDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. heyonglan@pumch.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-4752
Zhengyu JinDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. jin_zhengyu@163.com.
Huadan XueDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuai Fu Yuan 1#, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. bjdanna95@hotmail.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPhilips (China) · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities No. 3332019032Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81901829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the utility of three-dimensional (3D) amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging to differentiate mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) tumors in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA).

methodsForty-nine patients with EEA underwent T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, 3D APTw imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T MRI. Image quality and measurement confidence of APTw images were evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale. APTw and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated and compared between the dMMR and pMMR groups and among the three EEA histologic grades based on the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system criteria. Student's t-test, analysis of variance with Scheffe post hoc test, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsThirty-five EEA patients (9 with dMMR tumors and 26 with pMMR tumors) with good image quality were enrolled in quantitative analysis. APTw values were significantly higher in the dMMR group than in the pMMR group (3.2 ± 0.3% and 2.8 ± 0.5%, respectively; p = 0.019). ADC values of the dMMR and pMMR groups were 0.874 ± 0.104 × 10

conclusionsAPTw values may be used as potential imaging markers to differentiate dMMR from pMMR tumors in EEA.

Indexed as

Amide proton transfer-weightedEndometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingMismatch repair deficient

Identifiers

PMID34894294
PMCPMC8665952
OpenAlexW4200455226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.