Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894288›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Analysis of the paraspinal muscle morphology of the lumbar spine using a convolutional neural network (CNN).

David Baur, Richard Bieck, Johann Berger, Juliane Neumann, Jeanette Henkelmann, Thomas Neumuth, Christoph-E Heyde, Anna Voelker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David BaurDepartment for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Richard BieckInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Johann BergerInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Juliane NeumannInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Jeanette HenkelmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas NeumuthInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph-E HeydeDepartment for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Anna VoelkerDepartment for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. anna.voelker@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2715-5438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis single-center study aimed to develop a convolutional neural network to segment multiple consecutive axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices of the lumbar spinal muscles of patients with lower back pain and automatically classify fatty muscle degeneration.

methodsWe developed a fully connected deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a pre-trained U-Net model trained on a dataset of 3,650 axial T2-weighted MRI images from 100 patients with lower back pain. We included all qualities of MRI; the exclusion criteria were fractures, tumors, infection, or spine implants. The training was performed using k-fold cross-validation (k = 10), and performance was evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and cross-sectional area error (CSA error). For clinical correlation, we used a simplified Goutallier classification (SGC) system with three classes.

resultsThe mean DSC was high for overall muscle (0.91) and muscle tissue segmentation (0.83) but showed deficiencies in fatty tissue segmentation (0.51). The CSA error was small for the overall muscle area of 8.42%, and fatty tissue segmentation showed a high mean CSA error of 40.74%. The SGC classification was correctly predicted in 75% of the patients.

conclusionOur fully connected CNN segmented overall muscle and muscle tissue with high precision and recall, as well as good DSC values. The mean predicted SGC values of all available patient axial slices showed promising results. With an overall Error of 25%, further development is needed for clinical implementation. Larger datasets and training of other model architectures are required to segment fatty tissue more accurately.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedParaspinal MusclesHumansLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkMachine learningMRI imagingSpine imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.