Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894275›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2021

Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of biofortified BRS pontal and conventional carioca bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants.

Alexander M Cardoso, Carlos V F da Silva, Rodolpho M Albano, Vânia L M Pádua

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander M CardosoLaboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Western Rio Janeiro State University-UEZO, Avenida Manuel Caldeira de Alvarenga, 1203, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 23070-200, Brazil. alexandercardoso@uezo.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-0232
Carlos V F da SilvaGraduate Program in Translational Biomedicine, University of Grande Rio, Duque de Caxias, Brazil.
Rodolpho M AlbanoDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Biology Roberto Alcantara Gomes, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Vânia L M PáduaLaboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Western Rio Janeiro State University-UEZO, Avenida Manuel Caldeira de Alvarenga, 1203, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 23070-200, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current knowledge of bean plants microbiome is far from being complete. Unraveling the complexity of the bacterial communities within common bean cultivars that may significantly contribute to plant health, growth and protection against soil pathogens, represents a major challenge. In this study, the richness and composition of the bacterial communities from bean plant rhizospheres and control bulk soils were analyzed by high-throughput sequencing and comparative analyses. From the classified sequences, Proteobacteria represented the most abundant phylum (42-66%), followed by Acidobacteria (12-36%) and Actinobacteria (11-18%), Bacterial community structures were different between bulk soil and rhizosphere samples. Comparing the bean cultivars, the biofortified cultivar presented high number of sequences affiliated to the genera Burkholderia and Rhodanobacter. Interestingly, despite the presence of stable and persistent core bacterial taxa associated with the common bean varieties, our analysis suggested that the biofortified common bean cultivar could select and maintain differential abundances of microbial groups in the rhizosphere environment.

Indexed as

PhaseolusRhizosphereBacteriaPlantsSoil MicrobiologyAgricultureBiofortificationInoculantsMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID34894275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.