ArticleNeurocritical care2022
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Children with Acute Catastrophic Brain Injury: A 13-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aptamer-based proteomics in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Cognitive Processing of Novel Auditory Stimuli in Children with Acute Disorders of Consciousness.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Pediatric Perspectives on Palliative Care in the Neurocritical Care Unit.Neurocritical care · 2024Review
- Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group in the Pediatric Population.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Heart Rate Change as a Potential Digital Biomarker of Brain Death in Critically Ill Children With Acute Catastrophic Brain Injury.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Review
- Comment on "Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Children with Acute Catastrophic Brain Injury: A 13-Year Retrospective Cohort Study".Neurocritical care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to describe and analyze clinical characteristics and outcomes in children with acute catastrophic brain injury (CBI).
methodsThis was a single-center, 13-year (2008-2020) retrospective cohort study of children in the pediatric and cardiac intensive care units with CBI, defined as (1) acute neurologic injury based on clinical and/or imaging findings, (2) the need for life-sustaining intensive care unit therapies, and (3) death or survival with a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13 at discharge. Patients were excluded if they were discharged directly to home < 14 days from admission or had a chronic neurologic condition with a baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13. The association between the primary outcome of death and clinical variables was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Outcomes assessed after discharge were technology dependence, neurologic deficits, and Functional Status Score. Improved functional status was defined as a change in total Functional Status Score [Formula: see text] 2.
resultsOf 106 patients (58% boys, median age 3.9 years) with CBI, 86 (81%) died. Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies was the most common cause of death (60 of 86, 70%). In our multivariable analysis, each unit increase in admission pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score was associated with 10% greater hazard of death (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.17, p < .01). After controlling for admission pediatric sequential organ failure assessment scores, compared with those of patients with traumatic brain injury, all other etiologies of CBI were associated with a greater hazard of death (p = .02; hazard ratio 3.76-10). The median survival time for the cohort was 22 days (95% confidence interval 14-37 days). Of 23 survivors to hospital discharge, 20 were still alive after a median of 2 years (interquartile range 1-3 years), 6 of 20 (30%) did not have any technology dependence, 12 of 20 (60%) regained normal levels of alertness and responsiveness, and 15 of 20 (75%) had improved functional status.
conclusionsMost children with acute CBI died within 1 month of hospitalization. Having traumatic brain injury as the etiology of CBI was associated with greater survival, whereas increased organ dysfunction score on admission was associated with a higher hazard of mortality. Of the survivors, some recovered consciousness and functional status and did not require permanent technology dependence. Larger prospective studies are needed to improve prediction of CBI among critically ill children, understand factors guiding clinician and family decisions on the continuation or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, and characterize the natural history and long-term outcomes among CBI survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.