Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893969›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2022

Emotion norms for 6000 Polish word meanings with a direct mapping to the Polish wordnet.

Małgorzata Wierzba, Monika Riegel, Jan Kocoń, Piotr Miłkowski, Arkadiusz Janz, Katarzyna Klessa, Konrad Juszczyk, Barbara Konat, Damian Grimling, Maciej Piasecki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Małgorzata WierzbaLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteur Street, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland. m.wierzba@nencki.edu.pl.
Monika RiegelLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteur Street, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland.
Jan KocońDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland.
Piotr MiłkowskiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland.
Arkadiusz JanzDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland.
Katarzyna KlessaFaculty of Modern Languages and Literatures, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Konrad JuszczykFaculty of Modern Languages and Literatures, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Barbara KonatFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Damian GrimlingSentimenti Sp. z o.o., Poznań, Poland.
Maciej PiaseckiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland.
Artur MarchewkaLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteur Street, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion lexicons are useful in research across various disciplines, but the availability of such resources remains limited for most languages. While existing emotion lexicons typically comprise words, it is a particular meaning of a word (rather than the word itself) that conveys emotion. To mitigate this issue, we present the Emotion Meanings dataset, a novel dataset of 6000 Polish word meanings. The word meanings are derived from the Polish wordnet (plWordNet), a large semantic network interlinking words by means of lexical and conceptual relations. The word meanings were manually rated for valence and arousal, along with a variety of basic emotion categories (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, anticipation, happiness, surprise, and trust). The annotations were found to be highly reliable, as demonstrated by the similarity between data collected in two independent samples: unsupervised (n = 21,317) and supervised (n = 561). Although we found the annotations to be relatively stable for female, male, younger, and older participants, we share both summary data and individual data to enable emotion research on different demographically specific subgroups. The word meanings are further accompanied by the relevant metadata, derived from open-source linguistic resources. Direct mapping to Princeton WordNet makes the dataset suitable for research on multiple languages. Altogether, this dataset provides a versatile resource that can be employed for emotion research in psychology, cognitive science, psycholinguistics, computational linguistics, and natural language processing.

Indexed as

EmotionsLanguageFemaleHumansLinguisticsMalePolandPsycholinguisticsArousalEmotionEmotion categoriesSentiment analysisValenceWord meaningsWordnetWordsWord senses

Identifiers

PMID34893969
PMCPMC9579083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.