Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893935›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2021

Inter-observer agreement of vertebral fracture assessment with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry equipment.

Jacob M Mostert, Stephan R Romeijn, Petra Dibbets-Schneider, Daphne D D Rietbergen, Lenka M Pereira Arias-Bouda, Christoph Götz, Matthew D DiFranco, Hans Peter Dimai, Willem Grootjans

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacob M MostertDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Stephan R RomeijnDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Petra Dibbets-SchneiderDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Daphne D D RietbergenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Lenka M Pereira Arias-BoudaDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Christoph GötzImageBiopsy Lab, Vienna, Austria.
Matthew D DiFrancoImageBiopsy Lab, Vienna, Austria.
Hans Peter DimaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Willem GrootjansDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. w.grootjans@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the time and effort needed to perform vertebral morphometry, as well as inter-observer agreement for identification of vertebral fractures on vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images.

methodsNinety-six images were retrospectively selected, and three radiographers independently performed semi-automatic 6-point morphometry. Fractures were identified and graded using the Genant classification. Time needed to annotate each image was recorded, and reader fatigue was assessed using a modified Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Inter-observer agreement was assessed per-patient and per-vertebra for detecting fractures of all grades (grades 1-3) and for grade 2 and 3 fractures using the kappa statistic. Variability in measured vertebral height was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsPer-patient agreement was 0.59 for grades 1-3 fracture detection, and 0.65 for grades 2-3 only. Agreement for per-vertebra fracture classification was 0.92. Vertebral height measurements had an ICC of 0.96. Time needed to annotate VFA images ranged between 91 and 540 s, with a mean annotation time of 259 s. Mean SSQ scores were significantly lower at the start of a reading session (1.29; 95% CI: 0.81-1.77) compared to the end of a session (3.25; 95% CI: 2.60-3.90; p < 0.001).

conclusionAgreement for detection of patients with vertebral fractures was only moderate, and vertebral morphometry requires substantial time investment. This indicates that there is a potential benefit for automating VFA, both in improving inter-observer agreement and in decreasing reading time and burden on readers.

Indexed as

Spinal FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonHumansLumbar VertebraeObserver VariationRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeDual-energy x-ray absorptiometryInter-observer agreementOsteoporosisVertebral fracture assessmentVertebral morphometry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.