Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893871›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

The Survival Impact of Second Primary Lung Cancer in Patients With Lung Cancer.

Eunji Choi, Sophia J Luo, Jacqueline V Aredo, Leah M Backhus, Lynne R Wilkens, Chloe C Su, Joel W Neal, Loïc Le Marchand, Iona Cheng, Heather A Wakelee and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eunji ChoiQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-1433
Sophia J LuoQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-9773
Jacqueline V AredoStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Leah M BackhusDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4553-1003
Lynne R WilkensCancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Chloe C SuQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2204-3314
Joel W NealDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Loïc Le MarchandCancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5013-980X
Iona ChengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Heather A WakeleeDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1136-980X
Summer S HanQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Melinda L. Telli · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
Evaluation of genetic, clinical, and environmental risk factors to establish effective screening strategies for second primary lung cancerR37CA226081 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAN, SUMMER S · 2018 to 2024
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NCI NIH HHS R37 CA226081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer survivors have a high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC), but little is known about the survival impact of SPLC diagnosis.

methodsWe analyzed data from 138 969 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), who were surgically treated for initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) in 1988-2013. Each patient was followed from the date of IPLC diagnosis to SPLC diagnosis (for those with SPLC) and last vital status through 2016. We performed multivariable Cox regression to evaluate the association between overall survival and SPLC diagnosis as a time-varying predictor. To investigate potential effect modification, we tested interaction between SPLC and IPLC stage. Using data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC) (n = 1540 IPLC patients with surgery), we evaluated the survival impact of SPLC by smoking status. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

resultsA total of 12 115 (8.7%) patients developed SPLC in SEER over 700 421 person-years of follow-up. Compared with patients with single primary lung cancer, those with SPLC had statistically significantly reduced overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.06 to 2.17; P < .001). The effect of SPLC on reduced survival was more pronounced among patients with early stage IPLC vs advanced-stage IPLC (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 2.08 to 2.20, vs HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.70, respectively; Pinteraction < .001). Analysis using MEC data showed that the effect of SPLC on reduced survival was statistically significantly larger among persons who actively smoked at initial diagnosis vs those who formerly or never smoked (HR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.48 to 3.61, vs HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.98 to 2.03, respectively; Pinteraction = .04).

conclusionsSPLC diagnosis is statistically significantly associated with decreased survival in SEER and MEC. Intensive surveillance targeting patients with early stage IPLC and active smoking at IPLC diagnosis may lead to a larger survival benefit.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryCohort StudiesHumansLungNeoplasm StagingSmoking

Identifiers

PMID34893871
PMCPMC9002287
OpenAlexW4200251944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.