Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893831›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Combining genetic resources and elite material populations to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction in apple.

Xabi Cazenave, Bernard Petit, Marc Lateur, Hilde Nybom, Jiri Sedlak, Stefano Tartarini, François Laurens, Charles-Eric Durel, Hélène Muranty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic selection for crop improvement in fruits and vegetables: a systematic scoping review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xabi CazenaveUniv Angers, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, F-49000 Angers, France.
Bernard PetitUniv Angers, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, F-49000 Angers, France.
Marc LateurPlant Breeding and Biodiversity, Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques, Gembloux, Belgium.
Hilde NybomDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kristianstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-8106
Jiri SedlakVýzkumný a Šlechtitelský ústav Ovocnářský Holovousy s.r.o, Holovousy, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9360-4465
Stefano TartariniDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3920-5658
François LaurensUniv Angers, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, F-49000 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-7142
Charles-Eric DurelUniv Angers, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, F-49000 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3856-2837
Hélène MurantyUniv Angers, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRHS, SFR QuaSaV, F-49000 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3956-3807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection is an attractive strategy for apple breeding that could reduce the length of breeding cycles. A possible limitation to the practical implementation of this approach lies in the creation of a training set large and diverse enough to ensure accurate predictions. In this study, we investigated the potential of combining two available populations, i.e., genetic resources and elite material, in order to obtain a large training set with a high genetic diversity. We compared the predictive ability of genomic predictions within-population, across-population or when combining both populations, and tested a model accounting for population-specific marker effects in this last case. The obtained predictive abilities were moderate to high according to the studied trait and small increases in predictive ability could be obtained for some traits when the two populations were combined into a unique training set. We also investigated the potential of such a training set to predict hybrids resulting from crosses between the two populations, with a focus on the method to design the training set and the best proportion of each population to optimize predictions. The measured predictive abilities were very similar for all the proportions, except for the extreme cases where only one of the two populations was used in the training set, in which case predictive abilities could be lower than when using both populations. Using an optimization algorithm to choose the genotypes in the training set also led to higher predictive abilities than when the genotypes were chosen at random. Our results provide guidelines to initiate breeding programs that use genomic selection when the implementation of the training set is a limitation.

Indexed as

MalusGenomeGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticGenomic Predictiongenomic selectionGenPredgermplasmMalus domesticapopulation combinationShared Data Resourcetraining set design

Identifiers

PMID34893831
PMCPMC9210277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.