Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893807›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2023

Overcoming the impacts of two-step batch effect correction on gene expression estimation and inference.

Tenglong Li, Yuqing Zhang, Prasad Patil, W Evan Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tenglong LiAcademy of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 111 Ren'ai Road, Dushu Lake Higher Education Town, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, PRC.
Yuqing ZhangClinical Bioinformatics, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 333 Lakeside Dr, Foster City, CA 94404.
Prasad PatilDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave. Boston, MA 02118, USA.
W Evan JohnsonDivision of Computational Biomedicine, School of Medicine, 72 E. Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA and Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave. Boston, MA 02118, USA.

Funding

Removing batch effects in high-throughput biomedical studiesR01GM127430 · NIGMS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI William Evan Johnson · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
An interactive analysis toolkit for single cell RNA-seq in cancer researchU01CA220413 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI JOHNSON, WILLIAM EVAN · 2017 to 2019
$1.2M
Signature of profiling and staging the progression of TB from infection to disease.R21AI154387 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI JOHNSON, WILLIAM EVAN · 2020 to 2021
$468k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA220413NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI154387NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM127430NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127430NIH HHS 5U01CA220413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonignorable technical variation is commonly observed across data from multiple experimental runs, platforms, or studies. These so-called batch effects can lead to difficulty in merging data from multiple sources, as they can severely bias the outcome of the analysis. Many groups have developed approaches for removing batch effects from data, usually by accommodating batch variables into the analysis (one-step correction) or by preprocessing the data prior to the formal or final analysis (two-step correction). One-step correction is often desirable due it its simplicity, but its flexibility is limited and it can be difficult to include batch variables uniformly when an analysis has multiple stages. Two-step correction allows for richer models of batch mean and variance. However, prior investigation has indicated that two-step correction can lead to incorrect statistical inference in downstream analysis. Generally speaking, two-step approaches introduce a correlation structure in the corrected data, which, if ignored, may lead to either exaggerated or diminished significance in downstream applications such as differential expression analysis. Here, we provide more intuitive and more formal evaluations of the impacts of two-step batch correction compared to existing literature. We demonstrate that the undesired impacts of two-step correction (exaggerated or diminished significance) depend on both the nature of the study design and the batch effects. We also provide strategies for overcoming these negative impacts in downstream analyses using the estimated correlation matrix of the corrected data. We compare the results of our proposed workflow with the results from other published one-step and two-step methods and show that our methods lead to more consistent false discovery controls and power of detection across a variety of batch effect scenarios. Software for our method is available through GitHub (https://github.com/jtleek/sva-devel) and will be available in future versions of the $\texttt{sva}$ R package in the Bioconductor project (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/sva.html).

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionHumansPhylogenyResearch DesignBatch effectComBatGeneralized least squaresSample correlation adjustmentTwo-step batch adjustment

Identifiers

PMID34893807
PMCPMC10449015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.