Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893611›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Serological responses and vaccine effectiveness for extended COVID-19 vaccine schedules in England.

Gayatri Amirthalingam, Jamie Lopez Bernal, Nick J Andrews, Heather Whitaker, Charlotte Gower, Julia Stowe, Elise Tessier, Sathyavani Subbarao, Georgina Ireland, Frances Baawuah and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The immunogenicity of an extended dosing interval of BNT162b2 against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant among healthy school-aged children, a randomized controlled trial.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Immunology of RNA-based vaccines: The critical interplay between inflammation and expression.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Alphaviral backbone of self-amplifying RNA enhances protein expression and immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 antigen.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gayatri Amirthalingam *Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom. gayatri.amirthalingam@phe.gov.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-0975
Jamie Lopez Bernal *Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Nick J AndrewsImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Heather WhitakerStatistics, Modelling and Economics Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-1863
Charlotte GowerImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Julia StoweImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Elise TessierImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2712-7971
Sathyavani SubbaraoImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Georgina IrelandImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Frances BaawuahImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Ezra LinleySero-Epidemiolgy Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lenesha WarrenerVirus Reference Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Michelle O'BrienBrondesbury Medical Centre, Kilburn, London, United Kingdom.
Corinne WhillockImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Paul MossInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-1967
Shamez N LadhaniImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Kevin E BrownImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1568-683X
Mary E RamsayImmunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
UK Health Security Agency · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_20060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UK prioritised delivery of the first dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca) vaccines by extending the interval between doses up to 12 weeks. In 750 participants aged 50-89 years, we here compare serological responses after BNT162b2 and AZD1222 vaccination with varying dose intervals, and evaluate these against real-world national vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates against COVID-19 in England. We show that antibody levels 14-35 days after dose two are higher in BNT162b2 recipients with an extended vaccine interval (65-84 days) compared with those vaccinated with a standard (19-29 days) interval. Following the extended schedule, antibody levels were 6-fold higher at 14-35 days post dose 2 for BNT162b2 than AZD1222. For both vaccines, VE was higher across all age-groups from 14 days after dose two compared to one dose, but the magnitude varied with dose interval. Higher dose two VE was observed with >6 week interval between BNT162b2 doses compared to the standard schedule. Our findings suggest higher effectiveness against infection using an extended vaccine schedule. Given global vaccine constraints these results are relevant to policymakers.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleVaccine EfficacyAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34893611
PMCPMC8664823
OpenAlexW4200469237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.