Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893578›Full record

SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2021

Loneliness as an active ingredient in preventing or alleviating youth anxiety and depression: a critical interpretative synthesis incorporating principles from rapid realist reviews.

Eiluned Pearce, Pamela Myles-Hooton, Sonia Johnson, Emily Hards, Samantha Olsen, Denisa Clisu, Sarah M A Pais, Heather A Chesters, Shyamal Shah, Georgia Jerwood and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The changing impacts of social determinants on youth mental health in Australia.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Adolescents' and young people's experiences of social relationships and health concerns during COVID-19.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eiluned PearceDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. ellie.pearce@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4347-317X
Pamela Myles-HootonGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2219-1384
Emily HardsDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9274-4995
Samantha OlsenGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7879-7345
Denisa ClisuDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah M A PaisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Heather A ChestersGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Shyamal ShahDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Georgia JerwoodDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Marina PolitisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-5967
Joshua MelwaniDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4753-6745
Roz ShafranGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2729-4961
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBLinköping University · SEUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness is a relatively common problem in young people (14-24 years) and predicts the onset of depression and anxiety. Interventions to reduce loneliness thus have significant potential as active ingredients in strategies to prevent or alleviate anxiety and depression among young people. Previous reviews have focused on quantitative evidence and have not examined potential mechanisms that could be targets for intervention strategies. To build on this work, in this review we aimed to combine qualitative and quantitative evidence with stakeholder views to identify interventions that appear worth testing for their potential effectiveness in reducing loneliness, anxiety and depression in young people aged 14-24 years, and provide insights into the potential mechanisms of action. We conducted a Critical Interpretative Synthesis, a systematic review method that iteratively synthesises qualitative and quantitative evidence and is explicitly focused on building theory through a critical approach to the evidence that questions underlying assumptions. Literature searches were performed using nine databases, and eight additional databases were searched for theses and grey literature. Charity and policy websites were searched for content relevant to interventions for youth loneliness. We incorporated elements of Rapid Realistic Review approaches by consulting with young people and academic experts to feed into search strategies and the resulting conceptual framework, in which we aimed to set out which interventions appear potentially promising in terms of theoretical and empirical underpinnings and which fit with stakeholder views. We reviewed effectiveness data and quality ratings for the included randomised controlled trials only. Through synthesising 27 studies (total participants n = 105,649; range 1-102,072 in different studies) and grey literature, and iteratively consulting with stakeholders, a conceptual framework was developed. A range of 'Intrapersonal' (e.g. therapy that changes thinking and behaviour), 'Interpersonal' (e.g. improving social skills), and 'Social' Strategies (e.g. enhancing social support, and providing opportunities for social contact) seem worth testing further for their potential to help young people address loneliness, thereby preventing or alleviating depression and/or anxiety. Such strategies should be co-designed with young people and personalised to fit individual needs. Plausible mechanisms of action are facilitating sustained social support, providing opportunities for young people to socialise with peers who share similar experiences, and changing thinking and behaviour, for instance through building positive attitudes to themselves and others. The most convincing evidence of effectiveness was found in support of Intrapersonal Strategies: two randomised controlled studies quality-rated as 'good' found decreases in loneliness associated with different forms of therapy (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy or peer network counselling), although power calculations were not reported, and effect sizes were small or missing. Strategies to address loneliness and prevent or alleviate anxiety and depression need to be co-designed and personalised. Promising elements to incorporate into these strategies are social support, including from peers with similar experiences, and psychological therapy.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyLonelinessAdolescentAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID34893578
PMCPMC8661314
OpenAlexW4200575028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.