Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34893555›Full record

ArticleNeurology2022

Memory Trajectories Before and After First and Recurrent Strokes.

Wentian Lu, Marcus Richards, David Werring, Martin Bobak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wentian LuFrom the Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (W.L., M.B.), MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing (M.R.), and Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (D.W.), University College London, UK. wentian.lu.14@ucl.ac.uk.
Marcus RichardsFrom the Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (W.L., M.B.), MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing (M.R.), and Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (D.W.), University College London, UK.
David WerringFrom the Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (W.L., M.B.), MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing (M.R.), and Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (D.W.), University College London, UK.
Martin BobakFrom the Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (W.L., M.B.), MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing (M.R.), and Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (D.W.), University College London, UK.
MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00019/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00019/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00019/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesEvidence on timing of memory change after first and recurrent strokes is limited and inconsistent. We investigated memory trajectories before and after first and recurrent strokes in 18 European countries and tested whether the country-level acute stroke care was associated with memory change after stroke.

methodsData were from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (2004-2019). Incident first and recurrent strokes were identified among baseline stroke-free individuals. Within each country, each participant with incident stroke (case group) was matched with a stroke-free individual (control group) using propensity score matching. We applied multilevel segmented linear regression to quantify acute and accelerated memory changes (measured by the sum score of immediate and delayed word recall tests; 0-20 words) before and after first and recurrent strokes in both groups. Associations between stroke and memory were compared between countries with different levels of acute stroke care indicators.

resultsThe final analytical sample included 35,164 participants who were stroke-free at baseline (≥50 years). A total of 2,362 incident first and 341 recurrent strokes between 2004 and 2019 were identified. In case groups, mean acute decreases in memory scores were 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31, 0.65) and 1.14 (95% CI 0.80, 1.48) words after first and recurrent stroke, respectively, independent of a range of confounders. No such acute decreases were observed in the control group after a hypothetical nonstroke onset date. In both groups, memory declined over time but decline rates were similar (-0.07 [95% CI -0.10, -0.05] vs -0.06 [95% CI -0.08, -0.05] words per year). The mean acute decreases in memory scores after first and recurrent strokes were smaller in countries with better access to endovascular treatment. DISCUSSION: We found acute decreases but not accelerated declines in memory after first and recurrent strokes. Improved endovascular therapy might be associated with smaller memory loss after stroke but more evidence based on individual-level data is needed. More effort should be made in early assessment and intensive prevention of stroke among the ageing population and promoting access to and delivery of acute stroke care among patients with stroke.

Indexed as

StrokeAgingEuropeHumansMemory DisordersTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34893555
PMCPMC8829961
OpenAlexW4200128287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.