SynthesisJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2022
Month of birth and the risk of narcolepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Patients With Narcolepsy.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Prevalence and factors of sleep problems among Japanese children: a population-based study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the month of birth (MOB) and the risk of narcolepsy.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from their inception to September 30, 2021. We also added data on narcolepsy from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Then we extracted the relative risk (RR) ratios of narcolepsy in each month of birth to those of the general population and transformed them from MOB to season. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled RR ratios from the meta-analysis and 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsThe meta-analysis analyzed 7 studies and included 3,776 patients from 8 areas (Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Taiwan, and United States). The RR ratio was highest in March (1.11; 95% CI, 0.99-1.26) and August (1.11; 95% CI, 0.98-1.26) and lowest in April (0.90; 95% CI, 0.78-1.03). However, none of the MOBs reached statistical significance. Moreover, the narcolepsy risk patterns on the 3 continents (Asia, Europe, and North America) were different. In North America, the highest and lowest significant risks were found in March (1.47; 95% CI, 1.20-1.79) and September (0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-0.99). In Asia, the lowest notable risk was in April (0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97). In Europe, the risk of narcolepsy was not significantly related to any MOB. In terms of seasons, only spring MOBs in North America had a significantly higher risk (1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.38).
conclusionsThe findings indicated that the risk of narcolepsy and MOB differed across the 3 continents. This study indicates the important role of environmental factors in narcolepsy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registry: PROSPERO; Identifier: CRD42020186660. CITATION: Hsu C-W, Tseng P-T, Tu Y-K, et al. Month of birth and the risk of narcolepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.