Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34892185›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2021

Investigating ADHD subtypes in children using temporal dynamics of the electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates

Na Luo, Xiangsheng Luo, Dongren Yao, Vince D Calhoun, Li Sun, Jing Sui

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Na Luo
Xiangsheng Luo
Dongren Yao
Vince D Calhoun
Li Sun
Jing Sui
Beijing Normal University · CNEmory University · USInstitute of Automation · CNMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USPeking University · CNPeking University Sixth Hospital · CN

Funding

Informed Data-Driven Fusion of Behavior, Brain Function, and GenesR01EB005846 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2005 to 2016
$5.5M
Data-driven approaches to identify biomarkers from multimodal imaging big dataR01MH117107 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005846NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in children, usually categorized as three predominant subtypes, persistent inattention (ADHD-I), hyperactivity-impulsivity (ADHD-HI) and a combination of both (ADHD-C). Identifying reliable features to distinguish different subtypes is significant for clinical individualized treatment. In this work, we conducted a two-stage electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis on 54 healthy controls and 107 ADHD children, including 54 ADHD-Is and 53 ADHD-Cs, aiming to examine the dynamic temporal alterations in ADHDs compared to healthy controls (HCs), as well as different EEG signatures between ADHD subtypes. Results demonstrated that the dynamics of resting-state EEG microstates, particularly centering on salience (state C) and frontal-parietal network (state D), were significantly aberrant in ADHDs. Specifically, the occurrence and coverage of state C were decreased in ADHDs (p=0.002; p=0.0015), while the duration and contribution of state D were observably increased (p=0.0016; p=0.0001) compared to HCs. Moreover, the transition probability between state A and C was significantly decreased (p=9.85e-7; p=2.33e-7) in ADHDs, but otherwise increased between state B and D (p=1.02e-7; p=1.07e-6). By contrast, remarkable subtype differences were found primarily on the visual network (state B) between ADHD-Is and ADHD-Cs. Specifically, ADHD-Cs have higher occurrence and coverage of state B than ADHD-Is (p=9.35e-5; p=1.51e-8), suggesting these patients more impulsively aimed to open their eyes when asked to keep eyes closed during the data collection. In summary, this work carefully leveraged EEG temporal dynamics to investigate the aberrant microstate features in ADHDs and provided a new window to look into the subtle differences between ADHD subtypes, which may help to assist precision diagnosis in future.Clinical Relevance- This work established the use of EEG microstate features to investigate ADHD dysfunction and its subtypes, providing a new window for better diagnosis of ADHD.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrainCognitionElectroencephalographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID34892185
PMCPMC9007722
OpenAlexW4200132603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.