Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34892151›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2021

Predicting RF Heating of Conductive Leads During Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T: A Machine Learning Approach

Can Zheng, Xinlu Chen, Bach T Nguyen, Pia Sanpitak, Jasmine Vu, Ulas Bagci, Laleh Golestanirad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Can Zheng
Xinlu Chen
Bach T Nguyen
Pia Sanpitak
Jasmine Vu
Ulas Bagci
Laleh Golestanirad
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Cyst-X: Interpretable Deep Learning Based Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Cystic TumorsR01CA246704 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Reconfigurable MRI technology for safe and high-resolution imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3TR01EB030324 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Radiologist-Centered Artificial Intelligence (RCAI) for Lung Cancer Screening and DiagnosisR01CA240639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Patient-adjustable MRI technology for high-resolution imaging of deep brain stimulationR00EB021320 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2018 to 2020
$733k
Safety assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained cardiac leadsR03EB025344 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2018 to 2019
$156k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246704NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB021320NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030324NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB025344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of patients with active implantable medical devices continues to rise in the United States and around the world. It is estimated that 50-75% of patients with conductive implants will need magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in their lifetime. A major risk of performing MRI in patients with elongated conductive implants is the radiofrequency (RF) heating of the tissue surrounding the implant's tip due to the antenna effect. Currently, applying full-wave electromagnetic simulation is the standard way to predict the interaction of MRI RF fields with the human body in the presence of conductive implants; however, these simulations are notoriously extensive in terms of memory requirement and computational time. Here we present a proof-of-concept simulation study to demonstrate the feasibility of applying machine learning to predict MRI-induced power deposition in the tissue surrounding conductive wires. We generated 600 clinically relevant trajectories of leads as observed in patients with cardiac conductive implants and trained a feedforward neural network to predict the 1g-averaged SAR at the lead tips knowing only the background field of MRI RF coil and coordinates of points along the lead trajectory. Training of the network was completed in 11.54 seconds and predictions were made within a second with R

Indexed as

HeatingHot TemperatureHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID34892151
PMCPMC9940641
OpenAlexW4200375915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.