Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34891864›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2021

Automatic Segmentation of Mandibular Ramus and Condyles.

Celia Le, Romain Deleat-Besson, Juan Prieto, Serge Brosset, Maxime Dumont, Winston Zhang, Lucia Cevidanes, Jonas Bianchi, Antonio Ruellas, Liliane Gomes and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Application of Deep Learning on CBCT in Dentistry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Celia Le
Romain Deleat-Besson
Juan Prieto
Serge Brosset
Maxime Dumont
Winston Zhang
Lucia Cevidanes
Jonas Bianchi
Antonio Ruellas
Liliane Gomes
Marcela Gurgel
Camila Massaro
Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo
Marilia Yatabe
Erika Benavides
Fabiana Soki
Najla Al Turkestani
Karine Evangelista
Joao Goncalves
Jose Valladares-Neto
Maria Alves Garcia Silva
Cauby Chaves
Fabio Costa
Daniela Garib
Heesoo Oh
Jonathan Gryak
Martin Styner
Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
Beatriz Paniagua
Kayvan Najarian
Reza Soroushmehr

Funding

Quantification of 3D Bony Changes in Temporomandibular Joint OsteoarthritisR01DE024450 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Lucia H Cevidanes · 2013 to 2026
$5.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to diagnose TMJ pathologies, we developed and tested a novel algorithm, MandSeg, that combines image processing and machine learning approaches for automatically segmenting the mandibular condyles and ramus. A deep neural network based on the U-Net architecture was trained for this task, using 109 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The ground truth label maps were manually segmented by clinicians. The U-Net takes 2D slices extracted from the 3D volumetric images. All the 3D scans were cropped depending on their size in order to keep only the mandibular region of interest. The same anatomic cropping region was used for every scan in the dataset. The scans were acquired at different centers with different resolutions. Therefore, we resized all scans to 512×512 in the pre-processing step where we also performed contrast adjustment as the original scans had low contrast. After the pre-processing, around 350 slices were extracted from each scan, and used to train the U-Net model. For the cross-validation, the dataset was divided into 10 folds. The training was performed with 60 epochs, a batch size of 8 and a learning rate of 2×10

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyNeural Networks, ComputerImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMandible

Identifiers

PMID34891864
PMCPMC8994041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.