Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34891768›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2021

An Integrated Toolkit for Extensible and Reproducible Neuroscience.

Jordan K Matelsky, Luis M Rodriguez, Daniel Xenes, Timothy Gion, Robert Hider, Brock A Wester, William Gray-Roncal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Integrated Toolkit for Extensible and Reproducible Neuroscience.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jordan K Matelsky
Luis M Rodriguez
Daniel Xenes
Timothy Gion
Robert Hider
Brock A Wester
William Gray-Roncal

Funding

Boss: A cloud-based data archive for electron microscopy and x-ray microtomographyR24MH114785 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROCK A. WESTER · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
SABER: Scalable Analytics for Brain Exploration Research using X-Ray Microtomography and Electron MicroscopyR24MH114799 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY RONCAL, WILLIAM R · 2017 to 2019
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114785NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As neuroimagery datasets continue to grow in size, the complexity of data analyses can require a detailed understanding and implementation of systems computer science for storage, access, processing, and sharing. Currently, several general data standards (e.g., Zarr, HDF5, precomputed) and purpose-built ecosystems (e.g., BossDB, CloudVolume, DVID, and Knossos) exist. Each of these systems has advantages and limitations and is most appropriate for different use cases. Using datasets that don't fit into RAM in this heterogeneous environment is challenging, and significant barriers exist to leverage underlying research investments. In this manuscript, we outline our perspective for how to approach this challenge through the use of community provided, standardized interfaces that unify various computational backends and abstract computer science challenges from the scientist. We introduce desirable design patterns and share our reference implementation called intern.

Indexed as

NeurosciencesDatasets as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34891768
PMCPMC9044020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.