Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34890928›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2022

Assessing subjective cannabis effects in daily life with contemporary young adult language.

Renee M Cloutier, Brian H Calhoun, Stephanie T Lanza, Ashley N Linden-Carmichael

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renee M CloutierThe Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, 314 Biobehavioral Health, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: renee.cloutier@pitt.edu.
Brian H CalhounThe University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1100 NE 45th Street, Suite 300, Box 354944, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. Electronic address: bhc120@uw.edu.
Stephanie T LanzaThe Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, 314 Biobehavioral Health, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: slanza@psu.edu.
Ashley N Linden-CarmichaelThe Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, 314 Biobehavioral Health, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: axc547@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Pilot, Mentoring, and Professional Development CoreP50DA039838 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI COLLINS, LINDA M · 2015 to 2019
$13.9M
PREVENTION AND METHODOLOGY TRAINING (PAMT)T32DA017629 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI Eric D Claus, Rina D Eiden · 2005 to 2026
$9.5M
Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use: Momentary Influences and ConsequencesK01AA026854 · NIAAA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LINDEN-CARMICHAEL, ASHLEY NICOLE · 2019 to 2023
$826k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA026854NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039838NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA017629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubjective ratings of cannabis effects are important predictors of use-related consequences. However, psychometric research is fairly limited, particularly for measures to capture variability in daily life when diverse modes of cannabis administration and co-substance use are common.

methodsThis study evaluated the predictive utility of a revised item to assess perceived cannabis effects and examined modes of cannabis administration and alcohol and nicotine co-use as moderators. Participants were 106 young adults (18-25 years; 51% female) who completed up to 14 consecutive daily reports of substance use (n = 1405 person-days). Two measures of subjective effects were examined: a standard item (0-100 rating of "how high do you feel?") and a revised item that uses four crowd-sourced anchor points ranging from relaxed (0), calm/chill (33), high (67), and stoned/baked (100). The items shared substantial variance (Pseudo-R

resultsThe cannabis consumption-subjective effects link was weaker on blunt-only days compared to vape-only days. Subjective cannabis effects were higher on nicotine co-use days after controlling for cannabis consumption; neither alcohol nor nicotine co-use moderated the cannabis consumption-subjective effects link. DISCUSSION: The revised subjective cannabis effects item is a viable alternative to the standard item among young adults who engage in simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use.

conclusionsFuture research focused on characterizing the variability in cannabis effects is needed.

Indexed as

CannabisHallucinogensCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsEthanolFemaleHumansLanguageMaleYoung AdultCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsEthanolHallucinogensCannabisDaily diaryMarijuanaMode of administrationSubjective effectsSubjective intoxication

Identifiers

PMID34890928
PMCPMC8714699
OpenAlexW3215365979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.