Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34890537›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2022

Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose of CoronaVac, and immune persistence of a two-dose schedule, in healthy adults: interim results from two single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trials.

Gang Zeng, Qianhui Wu, Hongxing Pan, Minjie Li, Juan Yang, Lin Wang, Zhiwei Wu, Deyu Jiang, Xiaowei Deng, Kai Chu and 8 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 175 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04352608 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ Clinical Trial, to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivated Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18~59 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinovac Research and Development Co., Ltd.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled744ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsTwo doses of medium dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the emergency vaccination schedule, Two doses of high dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the emergency vaccination schedule, Two doses of placebo at the emergency vaccination schedule, Two doses of medium dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the routine vaccination schedule, Two doses of high dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the routine vaccination schedule
NCT04383574 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial, to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell), in Healthy Elderly Aged 60 Years and Above

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd.Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled422ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsTwo doses of medium dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of high dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of placebo at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of low dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Neutralizing antibodies induced by homologous and heterologous boosters in CoronaVac vaccines in Chile.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Trial
  12. Immunogenicity of a fractional or full third dose of AZD1222 vaccine or BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine after two doses of CoronaVac vaccines against the Delta and Omicron variants.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gang ZengSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Qianhui WuSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Hongxing PanJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Minjie LiHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Juan YangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lin WangSinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei WuHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Deyu JiangSinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaowei DengSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Kai ChuJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Wen ZhengSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Lei WangSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Wanying LuSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Bihua HanHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuliang ZhaoHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. Electronic address: yuliang_zh1@163.com.
Fengcai ZhuJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China. Electronic address: jszfc@vip.sina.com.
Hongjie YuSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: yhj@fudan.edu.cn.
Weidong YinSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China. Electronic address: yinwd@sinovac.comv.
Fudan University · CNHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSinovac Biotech · CNJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShanghai Public Health Clinical Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale vaccination against COVID-19 is being implemented in many countries with CoronaVac, an inactivated vaccine. We aimed to assess the immune persistence of a two-dose schedule of CoronaVac, and the immunogenicity and safety of a third dose of CoronaVac, in healthy adults aged 18 years and older.

methodsIn the first of two single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trials, adults aged 18-59 years in Jiangsu, China, were initially allocated (1:1) into two vaccination schedule cohorts: a day 0 and day 14 vaccination cohort (cohort 1) and a day 0 and day 28 vaccination cohort (cohort 2); each cohort was randomly assigned (2:2:1) to either a 3 μg dose or 6 μg dose of CoronaVac or a placebo group. Following a protocol amendment on Dec 25, 2020, half of the participants in each cohort were allocated to receive an additional dose 28 days (window period 30 days) after the second dose, and the other half were allocated to receive a third dose 6 months (window period 60 days) after the second dose. In the other phase 2 trial, in Hebei, China, participants aged 60 years and older were assigned sequentially to receive three injections of either 1·5 μg, 3 μg, or 6 μg of vaccine or placebo, administered 28 days apart for the first two doses and 6 months (window period 90 days) apart for doses two and three. The main outcomes of the study were geometric mean titres (GMTs), geometric mean increases (GMIs), and seropositivity of neutralising antibody to SARS-CoV-2 (virus strain SARS-CoV-2/human/CHN/CN1/2020, GenBank accession number MT407649.1), as analysed in the per-protocol population (all participants who completed their assigned third dose). Our reporting is focused on the 3 μg groups, since 3 μg is the licensed formulation. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352608 and NCT04383574.

findings540 (90%) of 600 participants aged 18-59 years were eligible to receive a third dose, of whom 269 (50%) received the primary third dose 2 months after the second dose (cohorts 1a-14d-2m and 2a-28d-2m) and 271 (50%) received a booster dose 8 months after the second dose (cohorts 1b-14d-8m and 2b-28d-8m). In the 3 μg group, neutralising antibody titres induced by the first two doses declined after 6 months to near or below the seropositive cutoff (GMT of 8) for cohort 1b-14d-8m (n=53; GMT 3·9 [95% CI 3·1-5·0]) and for cohort 2b-28d-8m (n=49; 6·8 [5·2-8·8]). When a booster dose was given 8 months after a second dose, GMTs assessed 14 days later increased to 137·9 (95% CI 99·9-190·4) for cohort 1b-14d-8m and 143·1 (110·8-184·7) 28 days later for cohort 2b-28d-8m. GMTs moderately increased following a primary third dose, from 21·8 (95% CI 17·3-27·6) on day 28 after the second dose to 45·8 (35·7-58·9) on day 28 after the third dose in cohort 1a-14d-2m (n=54), and from 38·1 (28·4-51·1) to 49·7 (39·9-61·9) in cohort 2a-28d-2m (n=53). GMTs had decayed to near the positive threshold by 6 months after the third dose: GMT 9·2 (95% CI 7·1-12·0) in cohort 1a-14d-2m and 10·0 (7·3-13·7) in cohort 2a-28d-2m. Similarly, in adults aged 60 years and older who received booster doses (303 [87%] of 350 participants were eligible to receive a third dose), neutralising antibody titres had declined to near or below the seropositive threshold by 6 months after the primary two-dose series. A third dose given 8 months after the second dose significantly increased neutralising antibody concentrations: GMTs increased from 42·9 (95% CI 31·0-59·4) on day 28 after the second dose to 158·5 (96·6-259·2) on day 28 following the third dose (n=29). All adverse reactions reported within 28 days after a third dose were of grade 1 or 2 severity in all vaccination cohorts. There were three serious adverse events (2%) reported by the 150 participants in cohort 1a-14d-2m, four (3%) by 150 participants from cohort 1b-14d-8m, one (1%) by 150 participants in each of cohorts 2a-28d-2m and 2b-28d-8m, and 24 (7%) by 349 participants from cohort 3-28d-8m.

interpretationA third dose of CoronaVac in adults administered 8 months after a second dose effectively recalled specific immune responses to SARS-CoV-2, which had declined substantially 6 months after two doses of CoronaVac, resulting in a remarkable increase in the concentration of antibodies and indicating that a two-dose schedule generates good immune memory, and a primary third dose given 2 months after the second dose induced slightly higher antibody titres than the primary two doses.

fundingNational Key Research and Development Program, Beijing Science and Technology Program, and Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China. TRANSLATION: For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Young AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34890537
PMCPMC8651254
OpenAlexW4200252704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.