Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34890487›Full record

ArticleMedical education2022

Junior doctors' experiences with interprofessional collaboration: Wandering the landscape.

Titia S van Duin, Marco A de Carvalho Filho, Peter F Pype, Susanne Borgmann, Matts H Olovsson, A Debbie C Jaarsma, Marco A C Versluis

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What Feedback Content Do Clinical Teachers Address During OSTEs?Advances in medical education and practice · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Titia S van DuinCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions (CEDAR), Lifelong Learning, Education and Assessment Research Network (LEARN), University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-191X
Marco A de Carvalho FilhoCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions (CEDAR), Lifelong Learning, Education and Assessment Research Network (LEARN), University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-4092
Peter F PypeDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-0250
Susanne BorgmannStudent Deanery of the Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-6068
Matts H OlovssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5497-9013
A Debbie C JaarsmaCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions (CEDAR), Lifelong Learning, Education and Assessment Research Network (LEARN), University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-2002
Marco A C VersluisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-6613
University Medical Center Groningen · NLGhent University Hospital · BEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe transition from medical student to junior doctor is challenging. Junior doctors need to become part of the physician community of practice (CoP), while dealing with new responsibilities, tasks and expectations. At the same time, they need to learn how to navigate the frontiers and intersections with the other communities of practice that form the Landscape of Practice (LoP). This study aims to understand how junior doctors experience interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and what elements shape these experiences considering their transition to clinical practice.

methodsIn this multicentre qualitative study, 13 junior doctors individually drew two rich pictures of IPC experiences, one positive and one negative. A rich picture is a visual representation, a drawing of a particular situation intended to capture the complex and non-verbal elements of an experience. We used semi-structured interviews to deepen the understanding of junior doctors' depicted IPC experiences. We analysed both visual materials and interview transcripts iteratively, for which we adopted an inductive constructivist thematic analysis.

resultsWhile transitioning into a doctor, junior doctors become foremost members of the physician CoP and shape their professional identity based on perceived values in their physician community. Interprofessional learning occurs implicitly, without input from the interprofessional team. As a result, junior doctors struggle to bridge the gap between themselves and the interprofessional team, preventing IPC learning from developing into an integrative process. This professional isolation leaves junior doctors wandering the landscape of practice without understanding roles, attitudes and expectations of others.

conclusionsLearning IPC needs to become a collective endeavour and an explicit learning goal, based on multisource feedback to take advantage of the expertise already present in the LoP. Furthermore, junior doctors need a safe environment to embrace and reflect on the emotions aroused by interprofessional interactions, under the guidance of experienced facilitators.

Indexed as

Medical Staff, HospitalPhysiciansHumansInterprofessional RelationsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID34890487
PMCPMC9305225
OpenAlexW4200045959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.