Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34890238›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

A biopolymer hydrogel electrostatically reinforced by amino-functionalized bioactive glass for accelerated bone regeneration.

Xinxin Ding, Junyu Shi, Jianxu Wei, Yuan Li, Xiangbing Wu, Yi Zhang, Xue Jiang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Hongchang Lai

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pearl Powder Hybrid Bioactive Scaffolds from Microfluidic 3D Printing for Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xinxin DingDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1601-0871
Junyu ShiDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8241-2572
Jianxu WeiDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6384-0512
Yuan LiDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0133-7516
Xiangbing WuDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3552-2637
Yi ZhangDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6891-9262
Xue JiangDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-104X
Xiaomeng ZhangDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2504-8599
Hongchang LaiDepartment of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-563X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composite hydrogels incorporating natural polymers and bioactive glass (BG) are promising materials for bone regeneration. However, their applications are compromised by the poor interfacial compatibility between organic and inorganic phases. In this study, we developed an electrostatically reinforced hydrogel (CAG) with improved interfacial compatibility by introducing amino-functionalized 45S5 BG to the alginate/gellan gum (AG) matrix. BAG composed of AG and unmodified BG (10 to 100 μm in size) was prepared as a control. Compared with BAG, CAG had a more uniform porous structure with a pore size of 200 μm and optimal compressive strength of 66 kPa. Furthermore, CAG promoted the M2 phenotype transition of macrophages and up-regulated the osteogenic gene expression of stem cells. The new bone formation in vivo was also accelerated due to the enhanced biomineralization of CAG. Overall, this work suggests CAG with improved interfacial compatibility is an ideal material for bone regeneration application.

Identifiers

PMID34890238
PMCPMC8664252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.