Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34890157›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing

Clinical Recommender Algorithms to Simulate Digital Specialty Consultations.

Morteza Noshad, Ivana Jankovic, Jonathan H Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Morteza NoshadStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Ivana Jankovic
Jonathan H Chen

Funding

Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PERIYAKOIL, VYJEYANTHI S, YESAVAGE, JEROME A · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in medical science simultaneously benefit patients while contributing to an over-whelming complexity of medicine with a decision space of thousands of possible diagnoses, tests, and treatment options. Medical expertise becomes the most important scarce health-care resource, reflected in tens of millions in the US alone with deficient access to specialty care. Combining the growing wealth of electronic medical record data with modern recommender algorithms has the potential to synthesize the clinical community's expertise into an executable format to manage this information overload and improve access to personalized care suggestions. We focus here specifically on outpatient consultations for (Endocrine) specialty expertise, one of the highest demand and most amenable areas for electronic consultation systems. Specifically we develop and evaluate models to predict the clinical orders of these initial specialty referral consultations using an ensemble of feed-forward neural networks as compared to multiple baseline algorithms. As benchmarks closer to the existing standard of care, we used diagnosis-based clinical checklists based on our review of literature and practice guidelines (e.g., Up-to-Date) for each common referral diagnosis as well as existing electronic consult referral guides. Results indicate that such automated algorithms trained on historical data can provide more personalized decision support with greater accuracy than existing benchmarks, with the potential to power fully digital consultation services that could consolidate utilization of scarce medical expertise, improving consistency of quality and access to care for more patients.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyReferral and ConsultationAlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34890157
PMCPMC12049697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.