Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34889444›Full record

ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2021

Frontline treatment in CLL: the case for time-limited treatment.

Vincent Lévy, Alain Delmer, Florence Cymbalista

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent LévyDépartement de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Avicenne AP-HP, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France, and INSERM CRESS-UMR 1153, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Alain DelmerHematology Department, Reims University Hospital and Reims Champagne Ardenne University, Reims, France.
Florence CymbalistaHematology Biology, Hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France, and INSERM UMR 978, Bobigny, France.
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, the advent of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) has profoundly modified the therapeutic strategy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), introducing the concept of treatment until progression. Initially, the bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) was used as a single agent and then was rapidly combined in VEN-based regimens associated with either anti-CD20 or with BTKi. These regimens yielded a high rate of complete remission, leading to their use as a fixed duration treatment. The decision between continuous treatment with BTKi and VEN-based combinations relies mostly on comorbidities, comedications, and patient/physician preferences. Notably, with BTKi, cardiovascular comorbidities, hypertension, and potential pharmacological interactions should be carefully evaluated. On the other hand, the risk of tumor lysis syndrome with VEN should be monitored at treatment initiation. TP53 alteration and IGHV mutational status should also be assessed, as they remain important for therapeutic decisions. Fit patients with a TP53 wild type and IGHV-mutated CLL may still benefit from fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), as it may result in a very long remission duration. VEN-based treatments are well tolerated, and no additional toxicity has been observed when combined with anti-CD20 or BTKi. The 1-year fixed-duration association of VEN plus obinutuzumab was evaluated in frontline for older adult patients. Nonetheless, considering the favorable outcome, an extension of indication for fit younger patients is expected. The association of VEN and BTKi is promising, even if the follow-up is still short. It is currently being tested against CIT, BTKi continuous treatment, and VEN plus anti-CD20.

Indexed as

Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicClinical Trials as TopicCyclophosphamideHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsRituximabSulfonamidesAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicBTK protein, humanCyclophosphamideobinutuzumabProtein Kinase InhibitorsRituximabSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID34889444
PMCPMC8791103
OpenAlexW4200060375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.