Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34889430›Full record

ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2021

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where.

Andrew J Yee, Noopur Raje

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The burden of myeloma: novel approaches to disease assessment.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J YeeCenter for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Noopur RajeCenter for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in multiple myeloma therapy have led to deeper responses that are beyond the limit of detection by historical immunohistochemistry and conventional flow cytometry in bone marrow samples. In parallel, more sensitive techniques for assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) through next-generation flow cytometry and sequencing have been developed and are now routinely available. Deep responses when measured by these assays correspond with improved outcomes and survival. We review the data supporting MRD testing as well as its limitations and how it may fit in with current and future clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDisease ManagementFemaleFlow CytometryHumansMelphalanMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualStem Cell TransplantationAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID34889430
PMCPMC8791109
OpenAlexW4200115105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.