ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2021
Is there a role for anti-CD20 antibodies in CLL?
Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-line treatment for CLL in the era of targeted therapy.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Pirtobrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Navigating Resistance and the Personalisation of BTK-Targeted Therapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Real-World Effectiveness of Frontline Treatments Among Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results from ConcertAI.Cancers · 2025Article
- The Dual Role of B Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment: Implications for Cancer Immunology and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Learning from TCR Signaling and Immunological Synapse Assembly to Build New Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARs).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by improving survival of patients with CLL in conjunction with chemotherapy. However, the novel targeted agents such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) and venetoclax have now mostly replaced chemotherapy in frontline treatment of CLL. Several clinical trials have been conducted to examine the role of anti-CD20 mAbs in combination with BTK inhibitors and venetoclax. Addition of rituximab to ibrutinib does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) of treatment-naive patients with CLL, possibly related to ibrutinib's antagonistic effect on anti-CD20 antibodies. Alternatively, addition of a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb obinutuzumab to a more selective BTKi acalabrutinib may improve PFS but does not improve overall survival of patients with CLL in the frontline setting, pending long-term follow-up. Thus, we suggest that the addition of an anti-CD20 mAb to a BTKi is of most benefit to patients with autoimmune cytopenia or rapidly progressive disease. In contrast to BTKis, combination of fixed-duration venetoclax and anti-CD20 mAb can induce deep remission with high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease, correlating with improved survival of patients with CLL in both frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. In this review, we discuss clinical trials of BTKis and venetoclax that have investigated the role of anti-CD20 mAbs in frontline and relapsed settings of CLL treatment. We also provide an algorithm suggesting how anti-CD20 mAbs may be incorporated in the treatment of patients with CLL, including specific scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.