ArticleMedicine2021
Comparison of appendicular lean mass indices for predicting physical performance in Korean hemodialysis patients: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Muscle Imaging Assessments in Sarcopenia: A Statement from China National Center for Orthopedics (NCO) and the East Meets West Action Group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS).Calcified tissue international · 2025Review
- Sex difference in the association among nutrition, muscle mass, and strength in peritoneal dialysis patients.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
abstractFew studies have examined the optimal adjustment indices for predicting low muscle strength or physical performance in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Thus, the present study aimed to identify optimal adjustment indices for predicting strength and/or physical performance in HD patients.Our study was performed at an HD center (n = 84). Appendicular lean mass (ALM; kg) was calculated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. ALM were adjusted to body weight, height2 (Ht2), body surface area, or body mass index. Physical performance tests (sit-to-stand test performed 5 times test, sit-to-stand for 30 second test, 6-minute walk test, timed up and go test, gait speed, hand grip strength, average steps per day (AST), and short physical performance battery) were also evaluated. Participants with a below median value for each physical performance test were defined as the low group.The mean participant age was 55.6 ± 12.8 years; 44 (52.4%) were men. The univariate analysis revealed a significant difference in ALM/Ht2 values between the low and normal physical performance group in all physical performance tests except short physical performance battery. The multivariate analysis revealed a significant difference in ALM/Ht2 between the low and normal physical performance groups in hand grip strength, 5 times sit-to-stand test, sit-to-stand for 30-second test, and AST. In women on HD, most indices were not associated with physical performance or strength.We demonstrated that, in men on HD, ALM/Ht2 may be the most valuable among various variables adjusted for ALM for predicting physical performance or strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.