Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34888756›Full record

ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2023

CURA-An Ethics Support Instrument for Nurses in Palliative Care. Feasibility and First Perceived Outcomes.

Malene Vera van Schaik, H Roeline Pasman, Guy Widdershoven, Bert Molewijk, Suzanne Metselaar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Moral Distress Trajectories of Physicians 1 Year after the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Grounded Theory Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Malene Vera van SchaikAmsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.v.vanschaik@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8049-743X
H Roeline PasmanAmsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Guy WiddershovenAmsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bert MolewijkAmsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne MetselaarAmsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCal Humanities · USUniversity of Oslo · NOVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

ZonMw 844001315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating the feasibility and first perceived outcomes of a newly developed clinical ethics support instrument called CURA. This instrument is tailored to the needs of nurses that provide palliative care and is intended to foster both moral competences and moral resilience. This study is a descriptive cross-sectional evaluation study. Respondents consisted of nurses and nurse assistants (n = 97) following a continuing education program (course participants) and colleagues of these course participants (n = 124). Two questionnaires with five-point Likert scales were used. The feasibility questionnaire was given to all respondents, the perceived outcomes questionnaire only to the course participants. Data collection took place over a period of six months. Respondents were predominantly positive on most items of the feasibility questionnaire. The steps of CURA are clearly described (84% of course participants agreed or strongly agreed, 94% of colleagues) and easy to apply (78-87%). The perceived outcomes showed that CURA helped respondents to reflect on moral challenges (71% (strongly) agreed), in perspective taking (67%), with being aware of moral challenges (63%) and in dealing with moral distress (54%). Respondents did experience organizational barriers: only half of the respondents (strongly) agreed that they could easily find time for using CURA. CURA is a feasible instrument for nurses and nurse assistants providing palliative care. However, reported difficulties in organizing and making time for reflections with CURA indicate organizational preconditions ought to be met in order to implement CURA in daily practice. Furthermore, these results indicate that CURA helps to build moral competences and fosters moral resilience.

Indexed as

NursesPalliative CareAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEthics, ClinicalFeasibility StudiesHumansMoralsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical ethics supportEthicsMoral resilienceNursesPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID34888756
PMCPMC10167118
OpenAlexW3191667137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.