ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Real-time virtual intraoperative CT in endoscopic sinus surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deformable and Fragile Object Manipulation: A Review and Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring E-Vape Aerosol Penetration into Paranasal Sinuses: Insights from Patient-Specific Models.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Dense Reconstruction: A Review of Algorithms and Datasets.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Optimized gravity-driven intranasal drop administration delivers significant doses to the ostiomeatal complex and maxillary sinus.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEndoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is typically guided under preoperative computed tomography (CT), which increasingly diverges from actual patient anatomy as the surgery progresses. Studies have reported that the revision surgery rate in ESS ranges between 28 and 47%. This paper presents a method that can update the preoperative CT in real time to improve surgical completeness in ESS. APPROACH: The work presents and compares three novel methods that use instrument motion data and anatomical structures to predict surgical modifications in real time. The methods use learning techniques, such as nonparametric filtering and Gaussian process regression, to correlate surgical modifications with instrument tip positions, tip trajectories, and instrument shapes. Preoperative CT image sets are updated with modification predictions to serve as a virtual intraoperative CT.
resultsThe three methods were compared in eight ESS cadaver cases, which were performed by five surgeons and included the following representative ESS operations: maxillary antrostomy, uncinectomy, anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, and sphenoidotomy. Experimental results showed accuracy metrics that were clinically acceptable with dice similarity coefficients > 86%, with F-score > 92% and precision > 89.91% in surgical completeness evaluation. Among the three methods, the tip trajectory-based estimator had the highest precision of 96.87%.
conclusionsThis work demonstrated that virtually modified intraoperative CT scans improved the consistency between the actual surgical scene and the reference model, and could lead to improved surgical completeness in ESS. Compared to actual intraoperative CT scans, the proposed method has no impact on existing surgical protocols, does not require extra hardware, does not expose the patient to radiation, and does not lengthen time under anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.