Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34888724›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Computational Tools for Accurate Binding Free-Energy Prediction.

Maria M Reif, Martin Zacharias

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria M ReifPhysics Department (T38), Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Martin ZachariasPhysics Department (T38), Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany. martin.zacharias@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quantitative thermodynamic understanding of the noncovalent association of (bio)molecules is of central importance in molecular life sciences. An important quantity characterizing (bio)molecular association is the binding affinity or absolute binding free energy. In recent years, the computational prediction of absolute binding free energies has evolved considerably in terms of accuracy, computational speed, and user-friendliness. In this chapter, we first give an overview of how absolute free energies are defined and how they can be determined with computational means. We proceed with an outline of the theoretical basis of the two most reliable methods, potential of mean force, and double decoupling calculations. In particular, we describe how the sampling problem can be alleviated by application of restraints. Finally, we provide step-by-step instructions of how to set up corresponding molecular simulations with a commonly employed molecular dynamics simulation engine.

Indexed as

EntropyMolecular Dynamics SimulationLigandsProtein BindingLigandsBinding free energyDouble decouplingFree-energy calculationMolecular dynamics simulationsPotential of mean force

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.