ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2022
[German national survey of lecturers in ophthalmology on student teaching in the 2020/21 corona pandemic].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Teaching Concept Hanover : Digitally integrated teaching for medical students at the University Clinic for Ophthalmology of the Hanover Medical School].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- [Digital teaching 2020: Online teaching receives a better assessment than face-to-face teaching].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Students' and lecturers' perspectives on the implementation of online learning in medical education due to COVID-19 in Germany: a cross-sectional pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe corona pandemic has had a significant impact on the conditions of university student teaching. Due to the pandemic-related contact restrictions, digital teaching formats were widely used instead of the previous face-to-face teaching. In the summer semester of 2020 students received this well and evaluated it positively in recent publications. In this work, the main focus was on the experiences and assessments of teachers in ophthalmology during the winter semester 2020/2021.
methodsBy means of two anonymous surveys via online questionnaires, the lecturers in ophthalmology of German university hospitals as well as internal and external lecturers and staff members of the student teaching of the Department of Ophthalmology of the University Medical Center Mainz were asked about their experiences with the implementation of digital teaching.
resultsIn this context 95% of the teaching staff of ophthalmology departments of university hospitals in Germany stated that they had established digital teaching concepts at the latest since the corona pandemic. Hybrid formats with a proportion of face-to-face teaching were used by 68%. A wide variety of teaching formats were used. Difficulties were also encountered, particularly in interaction with students. Despite predominantly digital teaching, examinations continued to be held in face-to-face settings; only 18% of respondents stated that they had conducted online examinations. In the future, 86% of respondents want to integrate digital formats into their teaching concepts and establish them as a supplement to existing face-to-face teaching.
conclusionThe development of student teaching during the corona pandemic can serve as an opportunity for shaping the future education of medical students in ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.