Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34888433›Full record

ArticleAPL bioengineering2021

A suspended layer additive manufacturing approach to the bioprinting of tri-layered skin equivalents.

Richard J A Moakes, Jessica J Senior, Thomas E Robinson, Miruna Chipara, Aleksandar Atansov, Amy Naylor, Anthony D Metcalfe, Alan M Smith, Liam M Grover

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APL bioengineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. AlternativeExpert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Bioprinting a Tri-layered Skin Analogue.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. 3D bioprinting-a model for skin aging.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard J A MoakesSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6613-0658
Jessica J SeniorDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-0657
Thomas E RobinsonSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Miruna ChiparaSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Aleksandar AtansovSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Amy NaylorInflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Anthony D MetcalfeSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1633-6831
Alan M SmithDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2791-3208
Liam M GroverSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9774-7412
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/S001646/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin exhibits a complex structure consisting of three predominant layers (epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis). Extensive trauma may result in the loss of these structures and poor repair, in the longer term, forming scarred tissue and associated reduction in function. Although a number of skin replacements exist, there have been no solutions that recapitulate the chemical, mechanical, and biological roles that exist within native skin. This study reports the use of suspended layer additive manufacturing to produce a continuous tri-layered implant, which closely resembles human skin. Through careful control of the bioink composition, gradients (chemical and cellular) were formed throughout the printed construct. Culture of the model demonstrated that over 21 days, the cellular components played a key role in remodeling the supporting matrix into architectures comparable with those of healthy skin. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that even at seven days post-implantation, the integration of the implant had occurred, with mobilization of the adipose tissue from the surrounding tissue into the construct itself. As such, it is believed that these implants can facilitate healing, commencing from the fascia, up toward the skin surface-a mechanism recently shown to be key within deep wounds.

Identifiers

PMID34888433
PMCPMC8635740
OpenAlexW3216487732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.