Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34888288›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2021

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Farah Yasmin, Hala Najeeb, Abdul Moeed, Unaiza Naeem, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Najeeb Ullah Chughtai, Zohaib Yousaf, Binyam Tariku Seboka, Irfan Ullah, Chung-Ying Lin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 216 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
216citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
35.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

216 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 353 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

156 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Farah YasminDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hala NajeebDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abdul MoeedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Unaiza NaeemDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University Ojha Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Najeeb Ullah ChughtaiDepartment of General Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zohaib YousafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Binyam Tariku SebokaDepartment of Public Health, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Irfan UllahDepartment of Community Medicine, Kabir Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Amir H PakpourDepartment of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKDilla University · ETHamad Medical Corporation · QAJönköping University · SEKhyber Medical College · PKLiaquat National Hospital · PKNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy in the US throughout the pandemic has revealed inconsistent results. This systematic review has compared COVID-19 vaccine uptake across US and investigated predictors of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance across different groups. A search of PUBMED database was conducted till 17th July, 2021. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were screened and 65 studies were selected for a quantitative analysis. The overall vaccine acceptance rate ranged from 12 to 91.4%, the willingness of studies using the 10-point scale ranged from 3.58 to 5.12. Increased unwillingness toward COVID-19 vaccine and Black/African Americans were found to be correlated. Sex, race, age, education level, and income status were identified as determining factors of having a low or high COVID-19 vaccine uptake. A change in vaccine acceptance in the US population was observed in two studies, an increase of 10.8 and 7.4%, respectively, between 2020 and 2021. Our results confirm that hesitancy exists in the US population, highest in Black/African Americans, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and low in the male sex. It is imperative for regulatory bodies to acknowledge these statistics and consequently, exert efforts to mitigate the burden of unvaccinated individuals and revise vaccine delivery plans, according to different vulnerable subgroups, across the country.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2United StatesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinesintent to vaccinatesevere acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)United Statesvaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34888288
PMCPMC8650625
OpenAlexW3216902511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.